This article demolishing become the "stake through his heart will scream vampire" who have destroyed the relations between men and women in Spain.
Riddled with irrefutable data, which went unnoticed for most amid the brutal paranoia suffered, reading is almost obligatory for our brothers in the Americas because the mold used to generate this madness that has led to the homosexualization of a large part of youth is exactly the same. Read it by clicking here .
The Equality Minister Bibiana Aído, the Prime Minister, Zapatero and Vice President Fernandez de la Vega, when the law was passed against Gender Violence / Actuall
Gender Violence Act So PP and PSOE falsified the number of battered women
The Law on Gender Violence was based on a false axiom that the woman was a victim for the sake of being a woman and the man guilty by the mere fact of being male.
The problem is that the data were those who were and there was no statistical basis to justify a law on gender violence.
So the statistics are distorted: do not let reality spoil you a good law.
And as the real number of victims was not for this scheme (there were almost dead heat of male and female deaths in the domestic sphere) figures are falsified and statistics are rigged, eliminating the deaths of children, elderly and men, so that appeared only women.
It was necessary to justify that would make a Domestic Violence Act and, above all, it was necessary to justify the manna of the European Union which were to benefit ministries, experts, social psychologists, law firms and feminist associations.
Spain would receive tens of millions of European funds for Gender Policy
Spain would receive tens of millions of European funds for gender policies and it had to prove that she was the victim and the executioner man.
Otherwise, there was no money . No less than 24,000 million euros until 2012.
It all began in 2000 when the Spanish government (with Aznar in power), spurred by the PSOE and feminist associations decided to apply the policies of gender feminism emanating from the Beijing Conference (1995).
But hardly they could implement these policies (and corresponding financial allowance from Brussels) if the number of female victims was only slightly higher than male.
Gender? What kind, if the data of domestic violence that drove the General Council of the Judiciary was 40% of male deaths and 60% of female deaths ( which with a population of 43 million means touching the dead heat in terms statistics)?
Simply analyze the historical series 1995-2004 of the Statistical Yearbook of the Ministry of Interior (Police, Civil Guard) to conclude the same as the data of the Observatory against Domestic Violence Council of the Judiciary, ie the number of deaths in domestic violence or domestic stably distributed 40% male / 60% female.
Solution? the variable man eliminated in domestic violence statistics Council as well as organizations began working with public funds to the dictates of gender feminism.
And the prestigious Reina Sofía Center on Adolescence and Youth worked on women only variable express indication of the Council of the Judiciary man eliminating the variable in their statistics.
It was thus jump "domestic violence" -that which covers all household members, regardless of her sex to "gender violence" which only contemplates a reality: women as victims.
And if men murdered? No problem, the data and concluded eludes matter.
Actuall you have had access to a document that proves so final. The answer to the Reina Sofía Center gave an estranged father, Isidro Fresneda , when it requested information on deaths of men in the family.
"We inform you that our efforts with the judiciary, so far, are going to continue to focus on killings of women."
I have read that right, appointment to the judiciary, that is to say the instructions of the governing body of judges, the Reina Sofía is not reporting dead men . Statistically not exist ....
But the thing does not end here. What happens when a female which kills another? -in this case- not want to appear as an author, and therefore the woman variable is eliminated. According to the tenets of gender, women can never appear as a murderer, only and exclusively as a victim.
But that was not enough. It was necessary to show that women in Spain was battered by the mere fact of being . And in the absence of objective data, it was used to such a procedure as manipulable a survey. Because depending on the sample is chosen and the questions asked survey may be biased or another.
a survey to answer that the man does not value his work "sometimes" was developed and was considered technical abuse
The aim was to present to Congress a figure: two million battered women . And to reconcile reality with that figure, nothing better than:
Make a phone survey. Easier to handle than a face survey, with room for nuance.
Ask exclusively for women (eliminating the male variable in cases of domestic violence).
Collect perceptions, not objective facts or objectified.
And most importantly, consider "technical abuse" to vague, ambiguous and inaccurate responses.
For example, when asked if their partner (male) "does not value the work done" ... Or "does not take into account the needs of you" ... .or "It tells you where going to go without it." Only answer "sometimes" or "often" and technical abuse was considered. Which lacks rigor.
First because "no value work" or "not take into account the needs" is too vague. What needs referred specifically? How can you deduce from that, automatically, there is abuse? It depends.
And secondly because it is abuse, exercise "physical or mental violence continued mode" (Pan - Hispanic Dictionary of doubts). Can we call mental violence "does not value the work"? And it can be considered "ongoing violence as" the vague answer of "sometimes".
Thus, so little scientific and so manipulative, the Women's Institute in 2000 developed one macrosurvey and carried to term. The macrosurvey became the instrument of a self-fulfilling prophecy: prediction once made, is itself the cause of reality.
But the botched not stand the slightest filter and so expressed the Iceberg Report (prepared by an independent working group), which analyzes methodologically and presents its findings in the Senate in June 2001 (Joint Committee on the Rights of Women) .
It concludes that the Macrosurvey not meet the minimum methodological rigor for comparative studies by countries like US France and Germany such as Dunedin, Fiebert reports, the Report 111 on bidirectional violence or longitudinal Report Murray Straus.
However, the macro-CGPJ used as a tool to change the concept of domestic violence and eliminate gender violence statistics variable "man".
Instead of going to the Statistical Yearbook of the Civil Guard or the police (who spoke of some 50,000 override it complaints of mistreatment), the Judiciary accepted as scientific fact the figure of 2 million battered women, and to justify the development of a Gender Violence Act.
On such unscientific budgets was established in 2002, the Observatory for Domestic Violence (through an agreement between the Council of the Judiciary and the Ministries of Justice and Social Affairs).
The document explaining the objectives assumes the thesis of gender ideology, saying, mostly proportion, "violence in the family (...) constitutes violence, that is against women, which is based on the profound inequality of human beings. "
The goal was simply to cause alarm; and based on that channel through clientelistic structures, the huge amount of public resources associations linked to PP and PSOE channeled to lardo of years.
And it was lent, the governing body of judges and the Institute for Women. We talk about right-wing governments, chaired by Aznar (2000-2004) who laid the foundations for the famous law subsequently approved Zapatero's socialist government (2004).
One of the directors of the Institute of Women, Miriam Tey, admitted that after leaving office statistics were manipulated to continue the social alarm
We do not tell us. I recognized one of the directors of the Institute of Women, Miriam Tey, at a conference on the amendment of the Divorce Act and Joint Custody held in 2004 by the College of Psychologists of Madrid, when she had already left office.
In videotaped statements he said the figures on domestic violence were handled exactly when she ceased to be director of the institute, modifying the statistical variables. Thus, groups that were not considered as romantic relationship quickly incorporated into the electoral period as aggressors in domestic violence to continue the social alarm and increase in number of deaths.
The rest is history. The 87'7% of complaints by domestic violence does not end in a conviction , but by the mere fact of filing the complaint, the man can be arrested, expelled from his home and disqualified joint custody, while the woman has right to comprehensive social assistance, employment benefits and receive financial aid.
And those who benefit from the network of false allegations are various feminist associations.
Specifically, according to published Actuall , four feminist federations money from European funds hoard. This is the Women 's Foundation, the Federation of Separated and Divorced Women; the Federation of Progressive Women and the Association of Jurists Themis.
Four feminist federations strongly linked to the PSOE hogging through thousands of associations all lines of work of the Strategic Plan against violence against women and, consequently, European funds to eradicate this scourge.
Zapatero sold the law as an instrument to "defeat the criminal machismo , " has proved ineffective (because it decreases the number of murdered women) and also unfair (because it criminalizes the man for the sake of it).
Joaquín Leguina, former president of the Community of Madrid / EFE
Such absurdity and injustice saw the early socialist Joaquín Leguina, who denounced him on a platform of El País in 2004 , when the Gender Violence Act was passed.
In the article, Equality, parity and violence indicated that handled as "revealed truth" that "violence is unidirectional, men against women and never backwards."
And he warned that "revealed truth" does not stand the results of the most creditworthy analysis. He gave the example of surveys on domestic violence conducted in the US. "In cases basically severe physical violence, 35% are attributed to man, 30% women and the remaining 35% both. When all the analyzed cases of violence, including emotional, double participation (men and women) is about 50% of cases. "
Not only Leguizamon.
One hundred and eighty criminal progressive bias (judges, prosecutors, professors and specialists in criminal law), integrated into the so - called Criminal Policy Group issued a manifesto that year (2004), which harshly criticized the bill, warning it would be ineffective and "disappoint the victims."
Eighty percent criminologists warned that the law would fail and that protection against women is due to the increased vulnerability of those people and not the mere fact of belonging to a certain genre
They were based on the grounds that it was necessary to solve "social scourge" of domestic violence.
But they criticized the "positive discrimination" in favor of women , by the mere fact of being, "there is easily accommodated within the aims of criminal law".
Expressed fears that the Law on Gender Violence in crime could transform current lack of coercion and minor threats when they are committed by men and the victim is a woman.
And they added that "the criminal law should make clear that the enhanced protection [women] is due to the increased vulnerability of those people and not the mere fact of belonging to a particular genre."
In short, criminologists warned that failure was bound by law, to make gravitate on gender theory .
Zapatero's government had evidence as well that discouraged approve it. But nevertheless he went ahead, dismissing the opinions of experts.
In Spain imported falsify data and statistics fat because, as we have seen, there was a lot of money at stake
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No se admiten comentarios con datos personales como teléfonos, direcciones o publicidad encubierta
The Equality Minister Bibiana Aído, the Prime Minister, Zapatero and Vice President Fernandez de la Vega, when the law was passed against Gender Violence / Actuall
Joaquín Leguina, former president of the Community of Madrid / EFE
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No se admiten comentarios con datos personales como teléfonos, direcciones o publicidad encubierta