Detected high levels of toxic glyphosate in the urine of all persons who participated in a study in Franciafuente Miguel Jara

Apr 24, 2017




By Miguel Jara
The French organization Générations Futures has conducted a study on the presence of glyphosate, the most toxic herbicide used in the world in the urine of people. The results are chilling, all test persons carry this organism in its carcinogenic potential and least one, at doses greater than those permitted drinking water.
What has made this organization neighbor Spain country is to analyze the urine of 30 persons of both sexes, aged between eight and 60 years old, living in the city or in the countryside, with variable power supply (organic or not , vegetarian or not).
They include personalities like the former Minister of Ecology Delphine Batho, singer Emily Loizeau, the radio host Charline Vanhoenacker, humorist Alex Visorek or journalist and activist Marie-Monique Robin, author of books Comoa future harvest or The World According to Monsanto.

Do results ?: The 100% of the samples containing glyphosate at a concentration greater than the minimum quantization value test, i.e. 0.075 ng / ml.
The average concentration was found of 1.25 ng / ml. The lowest value was 0.09 ng / ml and the highest of 2.89 ng / ml.
In almost all cases (29 of 30), the concentration is greater than the concentration maximum allowed for the presence of a pesticide in drinking water (0.1 ng / ml).
This shows once again that we are contaminated by practices in the cultivation of harmful foods. Glyphosate is the most widely used pesticide in the European Union (EU). Scientific tests have continued publishing during the last decades documenting their health risks. So much so that in 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (agency of the World Health Organization) has classified glyphosate as "probable human carcinogen" .
We Move Europe , an organization geared towards action that is present in most of the countries of the European Union (EU) has launched a collection of signatures for the European Citizens ' Initiative (ECI) which seeks to ban glyphosate, improve evaluation risks of pesticides and reduce the use of toxic pesticides in the European Union.

As I said in another post on this topic , we can not take even a beer anymore.
In a study in the country of the drink par excellence, Germany, was found in several brands of drinking toxic values ranging from 0.46 to 29.74 micrograms per liter and in the case exceeded the highest in nearly 300 times the limit of 0.1 microgram force for drinking water.
Glyphosate is in consumer products and if causes severe liver disease in rats do not result in humans.
However, manufacturer and leading producer of the herbicide, Monsanto continues its lobbying and denial of the problem. As we have known recently, They have come to light several letters in the course of a judicial inquiry that reveal the bonds of multinational agribusinesses with senior regulatory agencies.
The company tries to hide what is obvious, that if analyzed 30 people and all wet herbicide means that almost all do in countries where the harmful product is used. So you like to piss in the field do not do please, can kill plants.

Posted by admin sea if it analyzed 30 people and all wet herbicide means that almost all do in countries where the harmful product is used. So you like to piss in the field do not do please, can kill plants. Posted by admin sea if it analyzed 30 people and all wet herbicide means that almost all do in countries where the harmful product is used. So you like to piss in the field do not do please, can kill plants. Posted by admin sea

The pharmaceutical and mafias, a very close business relationship

by  Carolanne Wright July 25, 2015

Website  Wakeup-World

Translation  Adela Kaufmann Original version in English

"It's scary to see how many similarities there

Among this industry [Pharmaceutical] and the mafia.

The mafia makes obscene amounts of money, as this industry.

Side effects of organized crime and deaths are homicides,

And the side effects are the same in this industry.

Mafia bribed politicians and others,

And so does the pharmaceutical industry ... "

former Vice President

Pfizer Pharmaceuticals  ¹ 

If you believe that pharmaceutical companies have the health of the general public in high esteem, it is time to reconsider this.

The industry is full of examples of wrongful death, extortion, fraud, corruption, obstruction of justice, embezzlement, false magazines, harassment and blacklisting that would make even the godfather flush more accustomed mafia.

Big Pharma  have been fined thousands of millions by the United States Department of Justice, but these huge fines do not stop corruption, is only seen as "the cost of doing business", similar to pay utilities.

As a physician and researcher, Peter C. Gøtzsche  has firsthand experience with crime behind the pharmaceutical industry - and then he exposes the massive fraud "Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime - How Big Pharma has Corrupted Healthcare."  
 

Perilous science 
 

Dr. Gøtzsche has an impressive clinical background, such as the Nordic Cochrane Center said - a non-profit organization that produces reliable and accessible information health that is free of commercial sponsorship and other conflicts of interest: 

Professor Peter C. Gøtzsche graduated as a Master of Science in biology and chemistry as a doctor in 1974 and 1984.

He is a specialist in internal medicine, has worked with clinical trials and regulatory affairs in the drug industry 1975-1983, and 1984-1995 Copenhagen hospitals.

With about 80 employees, he helped initiate  the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 with the founder, Sir Iain Chalmers, and established the Nordic Cochrane Center in the same year.

In 2010 he became professor of Clinical Research Design and Analysis at the University of Copenhagen.

Peter has published more than 70 articles in "Big Five" (BMJ, Lancet, JAMA, Ann Intern Med and N Engl J Med) and scientific papers have been cited more than 15,000 times.

Peter is also author of:

• Mortal psychiatry and organized denial (to appear in September 2015)
• Mortals Organized Crime and Drugs - As Big Pharma have corrupted Health (2013)
• Mammograms - Truth, Lies and Controversy (2012)
• Diagnosis and rational treatment - Evidence-Based making clinical decisions (2007)

Much of the academic career of Dr. Gøtzsche has focused on bias, tests and evidence synthesis.

In "Drugs Mortals and Organized Crime," Gøtzsche reveals corruption behind the exorbitant prices for brand name drugs, draws attention to the fact that drugs are not expensive because of the costs of development, but due to political pressure , marketing and excess profits. 

Also it notes that many trials are nothing more than smoke and mirrors, where pharmaceutical companies organize research so that the best stocks and comparison groups are selected for the simple reason that support the preferred result of the company; they control the data and make analyzes in-house and hire professional writers to write papers.

Pharmaceutical companies then collect the results to meet your marketing needs, rather than what is in the best interest of patients.

Often, they are paid academics to be listed as contributors to the study, however, in reality, have access to very little information and can not corroborate the data.

According to Gøtzsche,

"The 'best' drugs may be just those with the openly biased data."

Moreover, Gøtzsche brings home the truth that pharmaceuticals are simply dangerous for a variety of reasons:

"Our prescription medications are the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer in the United States and Europe.

About half of those who die have taken their medications correctly; the other half die of errors such as too high a dose or using a drug despite contraindications.

Our drug agencies are not particularly useful, since they depend on false corrections, which are a long list of warnings, cautions and contraindications of each drug, although they know that no doctor can possibly master the information of all these drugs.

The main reasons why many drug deaths are incapable drug regulation, widespread crime including corruption of scientific evidence on drugs and bribery of doctors, and is in the marketing of drugs, which is so marketing harmful as snuff and, therefore, it should be prohibited.

We should eat far fewer drugs, and patients should carefully study the prospects who bring drugs their doctors prescribe them and consult independent sources of information about drugs, such as Cochrane reviews, which will make it easier for them to say ' no, thank you '. "  ²

Before Gøtzsche shrink the argument as a simple point of view of a man on a complex issue, consider tainted history of pharmaceutical giant Merck.

blacklisting, false Magazines, Harassment and money

During testimony in a case for action in Australia, emails between Merck employees have labels such as as "neutralize", "neutralized" or "discredit" next to the names of doctors who criticized  the drug Vioxx . 

One email said:

"We may have to seek them out and destroy them where they live ..."

The court was told that  James Fries , professor of medicine at Stanford University, wrote to the head of Merck in October 2000, complaining of harassment that were receiving some members of his team who had criticized the drug.

"It was worse allegations Merck damage control by intimidation," he wrote.

"This has happened at least eight researchers (clinical) ... I suppose I myself was slightly threatened, but never spoke or wrote about these issues."

Leaping to 2001 and the company was still engaged in unethical tactics. 

Merck apparently:

It produces a fake magazine 'peer' under the name of "Austral-Asian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine" for the sole purpose of marketing articles for Vioxx.

He published a magazine article written entirely by ghosts and made a doctor sign his name to it, even though Merck employee felt that the data presented were "illusory". 

With this three - ring circus of corruption is conceived to become worse in the future, the  American Medical Association  (AMA) - at the right time - has introduced new guidelines essentially placed a gag order on any doctor who does not tow the line party, including those who speak  against pharmaceuticals .

"There are a lot of disapproval among medical professionals when it comes to natural health, and many refuse to consider the idea that healing involves more than pharmaceutical chemicals.

The Medical Association of America has recently put forth new guidelines:

'They create ethical guidelines for physicians in the media, writing reports on how doctors can be disciplined for violating medical ethics through its participation in the press and release a public statement denouncing the spread of dubious medical information through radio, television, newspapers and / or websites', "said Dr. Edward Group, founder of Global Healing Center.

Incredibly, the AMA represents only 17% of doctors, many of whom are medical students who were given a free subscription.

And yet, the organization is the fifth special interest group most powerful on Capitol Hill, paying a staggering $ 19.7 million for lobbying efforts only in 2014.

Read more about the  silencing  of doctors they do not agree  - and how to take action -  here .

Sources

1. Richard Smith: "  Is the pharmaceutical industry like the mafia ?"
2. " Our prescription drugs kill us in large numbers " Gøtzsche PC, Pol Arch Med WEWN. 2014; 124 (11): 628-34. Epub 30 October 2014

• http //www.cochrane.dk/about/profiles/pcg-profile.htm
• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4046551/
• http://www.cbsnews.com/news/merck-created-hit-list-to-destroy-neutralize-or-discredit-dissenting-doctors/
• http://www.citizens.org/ama-prepares-gag-order-medical-dissenters-health-freedom-stake/
• http://www.globalhealingcenter.com/natural-health/the-american-medical-association-wants-to-limit-your-health-freedom-again/
• http://www.anh-usa.org/ama-prepares-gag-order-for-medical-dissenters/
• 
  

DESCLASSIFIED CIA DOCUMENTS REVEALS... PLAN TO DESTROY SYRIA FOR OIL PIPELINE

by Claire BernishApril 11, 2017

from TheFreeThoughtProject Website

 

Geostrategically-crucial Syria has been at the center of a decades-long plot by the United States to depose the sovereign government and install one supportive of goals in the Middle East must be revisited - and quickly - before the beating of war drums drowns out the truth of our government's recently-espoused mission.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly castigated President Bashar al-Assad forordering a gruesome mass killing of civilianswith chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun.

This accusation, unsubstantiated due to lack of investigation, sparked a bolstering of support for the Syrian regime from both Moscow and Tehran.

Were the account of an ordered chemical weapons attack to prove unassailably true - and Assad isn't exactly known for being a gentle despot - Trump could have handily earned a congressional green light and perhaps approval from NATO to obliterate Syrian Arab Army forces responsible.

Perhaps...

Yet - images of deceased children, women, and men still echoing in shock waves around the planet - the reality show host-turned American President, tellingly, did neither.

Fifty-nine $1.87 million Tomahawk missiles raining down on a Syrian air base not long after the ostensive toxic gassing answered with finality whether Trump would fall in line with a succession of pompously bellicose presidents - as well as whether the neocon political establishment's longstanding mission to forcibly bend Syria to its will.

"Syria at present has a hammerlock on US interests both in Lebanon and in the Gulf - through closure of Iraq's pipeline thereby threatening Iraqi internationalization of the war.

The US should consider sharply escalating the pressures against Assad through covertly orchestrating simultaneous military threats against Syria from three border states hostile to Syria:

• Iraq
• Israel
• Turkey"

While the preceding bears the names of leaders and nations familiar to current headlines, that assessment, cogently titled, "Bringing Real Muscle to Bear Against Syria," from former CIA officer Graham Fuller in actuality discusses Syria under Assad's predecessor - his father, Hafez al-Assad - and is dated September 14, 1983, amid the Iran-Iraq War.

Read FULL report

"Bringing Real Muscle to Bear Against Syria"

Fuller's analysis, points out evinces Assad as a nuisance hindering American empire's lust to control vast fossil fuel stores and protect ally, Israel, against multiple threats in the Middle East.

Destabilization of Iraq and Iran also features prominently in the intricate U.S. plan to deal with the irritant, elder Assad - who, incidentally, recognized Western ulterior motives for what they were.

As the six-page above document continues,

Syria continues to maintain a hammerlock on two key U.S. interests in the Middle East:

• Syrian refusal to withdraw its troops from Lebanon ensures Israeli occupation in the south

• Syrian closure of the Iraqi pipeline has been a key factor in bringing Iraq to its financial knees, impelling it towards dangerous internationalization of the war in the Gulf.

Diplomatic initiatives to date have had little effect on Assad who has so far correctly calculated the play of forces in the area and concluded that they are only weakly arrayed against him.

If the U.S. is to rein in Syria's spoiling role, it can only do so through the exertion of real muscle which will pose a vital threat to Assad's position and power.

With Iraq seeking to enjoin support internationally in the war, the U.S. had to scramble to prevent the shutdown of a pipeline - a dilemma Fuller suggests could be alleviated through a change in narrative to present Syria as a more deviant enemy than even Iran.

That, alone, would have changed the face of the war bearing the names of the two principal adversaries:

• Sunni majority, Iraq
• Syria-allied, Shi'a, Iran

Fuller asserted,

"The US should consider urging Iraq to take the war to the other key source of its predicament: Syria."

Further, he continued,

"The US should consider sharply escalating the pressures against Assad [Sr.] through covertly orchestrating simultaneous military threats against Syria from three border states hostile to Syria: Iraq, Israel and Turkey.

Iraq, perceived to be increasingly desperate in the Gulf war, would undertake limited military (air) operations against Syria with the sole goal of opening the pipeline.

Although opening war on a second front against Syria poses considerable risk to Iraq, Syria would also face a two-front war since it is already heavily engaged in the Bekaa, on the Golan and in maintaining control over a hostile and restive population inside Syria.

"Israel would simultaneously raise tensions along Syria's Lebanon front without actually going to war.

Turkey, angered by Syrian support to Armenian terrorism, to Iraqi Kurds on Turkey's Kurdish border areas and to Turkish terrorists operating out of northern Syria, has often considered launching unilateral military operations against terrorist camps in northern Syria.

Virtually all Arab states would have sympathy for Iraq.

"Faced with three belligerent fronts, Assad would probably be forced to abandon his policy of closure of the pipeline. Such a concession would relieve the economic pressure on Iraq, and perhaps force Iran to reconsider bringing the war to an end.

It would be a sharpening blow to Syria's prestige and could effect the equation of forces in Lebanon."

In context, then-President Ronald Reagan faced pressure both to insert military power in Lebanon - a theater of stated neutrality for the U.S. - and to prohibit actual military assistance in the fraught regional entanglement.

That is, until a suicide bomber decimated a U.S. Marines barracks encamped at an airport in Beirut, killing hundreds - just one month subsequent to the date on Fuller's Syria action plan.

Micah Zenko, Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) - an albeit establishment - and Deep State-connected think tank - in "When America Attacked Syria,"wrote in 2012:

"The October 23, 1983, suicide truck bombing of the Marine barracks at the Beirut International Airport would kill 241 U.S. military personnel; simultaneously, another suicide bomber killed fifty-eight French servicemen of the MNF several kilometers away.

(Two weeks later, yet another truck bomb exploded in the Israeli military headquarters in Tyre, killing sixty.)

A FBI forensics assessment called the Marine barracks bombing the 'biggest non-nuclear explosion since World War II.'

According to a Pentagon commission formed to investigate the attack, it was 'tantamount to an act of war using the medium of terrorism.'

Within weeks, the CIA determined that,

'the bombings… of the United States and French MNF headquarters were carried out by Shia radicals, armed, trained, and directed by Syria and Iran'."

That the CIA - master meddler in the affairs of sovereign nations - determined fault for the bombings rested with Syria and Iran left both plausibly responsible, with public perception largely following suit.

That a situation eerily similar - in behind-the-scenes string-pulling and long-term U.S. commitment to deposing an Assad from rule in Syria - appears to be playing out nearly three-and-a-half decades later, bellows resoundingly on failures of interventionist foreign policy.

Or, perhaps, its successes.

"Such a threat must be primarily military in nature.

At present there are three relatively hostile elements around Syria's borders:

• Israel
• Iraq
• Turkey

Consideration must be given to orchestrating a credible military threat against Syria in order to induce at least some moderate change in its policies," Fuller explained in the document.

"This paper proposes serious examination of the use of all three states – acting independently – to exert the necessary threat. Use of any one state in isolation cannot create such a credible threat."

Syria is now a landmine for the Trump administration - as it has been in varying intensity for a lengthy succession of presidents before.

To make proud the neocon war-hawks ravenous to rain missiles upon Assad's forces would duly emblazon the already blood-tinged U.S. government as chief aggressor in a conflict that had been nearing resolution - if not, ultimately, the catalyst for the third world war.

To withdraw militarily and negotiate a reasonable conclusion to the quagmire in Syria, would mean admitting defeat in the removal of Assad - as well as a black eye from the propaganda-suckered who find solace in the Western policy of killing people to teach people killing people is wrong.

In fact, for Trump and his ilk to save face over Syria and prevent the increasing likelihood of direct military conflict with Russia seems an impossibility at this late hour.

In only the past week, incessant drums of war reached a frenetic and dizzying pace - met only by furious uproar over yet another theater of war - despite Syria unofficially having been precisely that for the United States for decades.

DOCUMENTOS DECLASIFICADOS DE LA CIA REVELAN ... PLAN PARA DESTRUIR SIRIA PARA CANAL DE ACEITE

La Siria geoestratégicamente crucial ha estado en el centro de una trama de décadas de los Estados Unidos para deponer al gobierno soberano e instalar un apoyo a los objetivos en el Oriente Medio debe ser revisado - y rápidamente - antes de que los golpes de los tambores de guerra ahogue la La verdad de la reciente misión de nuestro gobierno.

El presidente Donald Trump ha criticado en varias ocasiones al presidente Bashar al-Assad por ordenar un horrible asesinato en masa de civiles con armas químicas en Khan Sheikhoun.

Esta acusación, sin fundamento debido a la falta de investigación, provocó un refuerzo del apoyo al régimen sirio de Moscú y Teherán.

Si el relato de un ataque ordenado de armas químicas resultara infaliblemente cierto -y Assad no es exactamente conocido por ser un déspota suave- Trump podría haber ganado una luz verde del Congreso y tal vez la aprobación de la OTAN para borrar las fuerzas del Ejército árabe sirio responsable.

Quizás...

Sin embargo, las imágenes de niños, mujeres y hombres fallecidos que todavía se hacían eco en las ondas de choque alrededor del planeta -el anfitrión de la demostración de la realidad- convertido en presidente estadounidense, diciendo, tampoco lo hicieron.

Cincuenta y nueve 1,87 millones de misiles Tomahawk lloveron sobre una base aérea siria poco después de que el ostensivo gaseo tóxico respondió con carácter definitivo si Trump caería en línea con una sucesión de presidentes pomposamente belicosos - así como si la misión permanente del establishment político neoconservador Doblar Siria a su voluntad.
"Siria en la actualidad tiene un martillo en los intereses de EE.UU. tanto en el Líbano y en el Golfo - a través del cierre del oleoducto de Irak por lo tanto, amenaza la internacionalización iraquí de la guerra.

Estados Unidos debería considerar agudamente aumentar las presiones contra Assad a través de la orquestación secreta de amenazas militares simultáneas contra Siria de tres estados fronterizos hostiles a Siria:
Irak
Israel
Turquía"

Mientras que el precedente lleva los nombres de los líderes y las naciones familiar a los titulares actuales, esa evaluación, convincentemente titulado, "Llevando verdadero músculo para soportar contra Siria", del ex oficial de la CIA Graham Fuller en la actualidad discute Siria bajo el predecesor de Assad - -Assad- y está fechado el 14 de septiembre de 1983, en medio de la guerra Irán-Irak.



Leer el informe COMPLETO
"Llevar músculo real para llevar contra Siria"


El análisis de Fuller, señala Evinces Assad como una molestia que obstaculiza la lujuria del imperio estadounidense para controlar las grandes reservas de combustibles fósiles y proteger aliado, Israel, contra múltiples amenazas en el Oriente Medio.

La desestabilización de Irak e Irán también ocupa un lugar prominente en el intrincado plan de Estados Unidos para tratar con el irritante, el anciano Assad, quien, de paso, reconoció los motivos ocultos occidentales por lo que eran.

Como continúa el documento de seis páginas arriba,
Siria continúa manteniendo un martillo en dos intereses claves de Estados Unidos en el Medio Oriente:
La negativa de Siria a retirar sus tropas del Líbano asegura la ocupación israelí en el sur
El cierre sirio del oleoducto iraquí ha sido un factor clave para llevar a Irak a sus rodillas económicas, impulsándolo hacia una peligrosa internacionalización de la guerra en el Golfo.
Las iniciativas diplomáticas hasta la fecha han tenido poco efecto sobre Assad, que hasta ahora ha calculado correctamente el juego de fuerzas en la zona y concluyó que sólo están débiles en su contra.

Si los Estados Unidos van a frenar el papel estropeador de Siria, sólo puede hacerlo mediante el ejercicio de un verdadero músculo que representará una amenaza vital para la posición y el poder de Assad.



Con Irak tratando de imponer un apoyo internacional en la guerra, los Estados Unidos tuvieron que luchar para evitar el cierre de un oleoducto, un dilema que Fuller sugiere que podría ser aliviado a través de un cambio en la narrativa para presentar a Siria como un enemigo más desviado que Irán.

Eso, solo, habría cambiado la cara de la guerra con los nombres de los dos principales adversarios:
Mayoría suní, Irak
Siria-aliada, Shi'a, Irán
Fuller afirmó,
"Estados Unidos debe considerar la posibilidad de instar a Irak a llevar la guerra a la otra fuente clave de su situación: Siria".
Además, continuó,
"Estados Unidos debe considerar agudamente aumentar las presiones contra Assad [Sr.] mediante la orquestación secreta de amenazas militares simultáneas contra Siria de tres estados fronterizos hostiles a Siria: Irak, Israel y Turquía.

Irak, percibido como cada vez más desesperado en la guerra del Golfo, emprendería operaciones militares limitadas contra Siria con el único objetivo de abrir el oleoducto.

Si bien la apertura de la guerra en un segundo frente contra Siria plantea un riesgo considerable para Irak, Siria también se enfrentará a una guerra de dos frentes ya que ya está muy comprometida en Bekaa, en el Golán y en mantener el control sobre una población hostil y resistida dentro de Siria.

"Israel aumentaría simultáneamente las tensiones a lo largo del frente de Siria en el Líbano sin ir realmente a la guerra.

Turquía, enojada por el apoyo sirio al terrorismo armenio, a los kurdos iraquíes en las zonas fronterizas turcas de Turquía ya los terroristas turcos que operan en el norte de Siria, ha considerado a menudo el lanzamiento de operaciones militares unilaterales contra campos terroristas en el norte de Siria.

Prácticamente todos los estados árabes tendrían simpatía por Irak.

Confrontado con tres frentes beligerantes, Assad probablemente se vería obligado a abandonar su política de cierre del oleoducto, una concesión que aliviaría la presión económica sobre Irak y tal vez obligaría a Irán a reconsiderar la conclusión de la guerra.

Sería un duro golpe para el prestigio de Siria y podría afectar la ecuación de fuerzas en Líbano ".
En el contexto, el entonces presidente Ronald Reagan se enfrentó a la presión tanto para insertar el poder militar en el Líbano -un teatro de neutralidad declarada para los Estados Unidos- como para prohibir la asistencia militar real en el complicado enredo regional.

Es decir, hasta que un atacante suicida diezmó un cuartel de los Marines estadounidenses acampado en un aeropuerto de Beirut, matando a cientos de personas - sólo un mes después de la fecha en el plan de acción de Fuller en Siria.

Micah Zenko, Senior Fellow en el Consejo de Relaciones Exteriores (CFR) - aunque un establecimiento - y Deep State conectado think tank - en "Cuando Estados Unidos atacó Siria", escribió en 2012:
"El 23 de octubre de 1983, un atentado suicida causado por un camión suicida en los cuarteles de la Marina en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Beirut mataría a 241 soldados estadounidenses, mientras que otro atacante suicida mató a cincuenta y ocho soldados franceses de la MNF a varios kilómetros de distancia.

(Dos semanas más tarde, otra bomba de camión explotó en el cuartel militar israelí en Tiro, matando sesenta.)

Una evaluación forense del FBI llamó a los cuarteles de Marina bombardeando la "mayor explosión no nuclear desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial".

Según una comisión del Pentágono formada para investigar el ataque, "equivalía a un acto de guerra usando el medio del terrorismo".

En pocas semanas, la CIA determinó que,
"Los bombardeos ... de los Estados Unidos y del cuartel general francés de la Fuerza Multinacional fueron llevados a cabo por radicales chiítas, armados, entrenados y dirigidos por Siria e Irán".
Que el maestro de la CIA -madre en los asuntos de las naciones soberanas- determinó culpa por los bombardeos de Siria e Irán dejó a ambos responsables plausiblemente, con la percepción pública en gran medida siguiendo el ejemplo.

Que una situación similarmente inquietante - en el tirón de las cadenas detrás de las cámaras y el compromiso a largo plazo de EE.UU. de depositar un Assad de la regla en Siria - parece estar jugando casi tres décadas y media más tarde, el fuelle resonante en los fracasos De la política exterior intervencionista.

O, quizás, sus éxitos.
"Tal amenaza debe ser principalmente de naturaleza militar.

En la actualidad hay tres elementos relativamente hostiles alrededor de las fronteras de Siria:
Israel
Irak
Turquía
Se debe considerar la posibilidad de orquestar una amenaza militar creíble contra Siria para inducir al menos un cambio moderado en sus políticas ", explicó Fuller en el documento.

"El presente documento propone un examen serio del uso de los tres estados -actuando independientemente- para ejercer la amenaza necesaria.El uso de cualquier estado aisladamente no puede crear una amenaza tan creíble".
Siria es ahora una mina terrestre para el gobierno de Trump - como ha sido en la intensidad variable para una sucesión larga de presidentes antes.

Para enorgullecer a los neoconservadores de la guerra veloz de los misiles de la lluvia sobre las fuerzas de Assad, debía destacar el ya sangriento gobierno estadounidense como principal agresor en un conflicto que se había estado acercando a la resolución, si no al catalizador de la Tercera Guerra Mundial.

Retirar militarmente y negociar una conclusión razonable en el lodazal en Siria, significaría admitir la derrota en la eliminación de Assad - así como un ojo morado de la propaganda-suckered que encuentran consuelo en la política occidental de matar gente para enseñar a gente a matar gente Está Mal.

De hecho, para Trump y su gente salvar la cara sobre Siria y evitar la creciente probabilidad de un conflicto militar directo con Rusia parece una imposibilidad a esta hora tardía.

En tan sólo la semana pasada, los incesantes tambores de guerra alcanzaron un ritmo frenético y vertiginoso, sólo conocidos por un furioso alboroto sobre otro teatro de guerra, a pesar de que Siria no oficialmente había sido precisamente eso para los Estados Unidos durante décadas.