Translate

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta climate. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta climate. Mostrar todas las entradas

9 de septiembre de 2019

NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth's solar orbit, and Not because of SUV and fossil

Image: NASA admits that climate change occurs because of changes in Earth’s solar orbit, and NOT because of SUVs and fossil fuels

Natural News) For more than 60 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has known that the changes occurring to planetary weather patterns are completely naturaland normal. But the space agency, for whatever reason, has chosen to let the man-made global warming hoax persist and spread, to the detriment of human freedom.
It was the year 1958, to be precise, when NASA first observed that changes in the solar orbit of the earth, along with alterations to the earth’s axial tilt, are both responsible for what climate scientists today have dubbed as “warming” (or “cooling,” depending on their agenda). In no way, shape, or form are humans warming or cooling the planet by driving SUVs or eating beef, in other words.
But NASA has thus far failed to set the record straight, and has instead chosen to sit silently back and watch as liberals freak out about the world supposedly ending in 12 years because of too much livestock, or too many plastic straws.
In the year 2000, NASA did publish information on its Earth Observatory website about the Milankovitch Climate Theory, revealing that the planet is, in fact, changing due to extraneous factors that have absolutely nothing to do with human activity. But, again, this information has yet to go mainstream, some 19 years later, which is why deranged, climate-obsessed leftists have now begun to claim that we really only have 18 months left before the planet dies from an excess of carbon dioxide (CO2).
The truth, however, is much more along the lines of what Serbian astrophysicist Milutin Milankovitch, after whom the Milankovitch Climate Theory is named, proposed about how the seasonal and latitudinal variations of solar radiation that hit the earth in different ways, and at different times, have the greatest impact on earth’s changing climate patterns.
Support our mission to keep you informed: Discover the extraordinary benefits of turmeric gummy bears and organic "turmeric gold" liquid extract, both laboratory tested for heavy metals, microbiology and safety. Naturally high in potent curcuminoids. Delicious formulations. All purchases support this website (as well as your good health). See availability here.
The below two images (by Robert Simmon, NASA GSFC) help to illustrate this, with the first showing earth at a nearly zero orbit, and the second showing earth at a 0.07 orbit. This orbital change is depicted by the eccentric, oval shape in the second image, which has been intentionally exaggerated for the purpose of showing the massive change in distance that occurs between the earth and the sun, depending on whether it is at perihelion or aphelion.
“Even the maximum eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit – 0.07 – it would be impossible to show at the resolution of a web page,” notes the Hal Turner Radio Show. “Even so, at the current eccentricity of .017, the Earth is 5 million kilometers closer to Sun at perihelion than at aphelion.”
For more related news about climate change and global warming from an independent, non-establishment perspective, be sure to check out ClimateScienceNews.com.

The biggest factor affecting earth’s climate is the SUN

As for earth’s obliquity, or its change in axial tilt, the below two images (Robert Simmon, NASA GSFC) show the degree to which the earth can shift on both its axis and its rotational orientation. At the higher tilts, earth’s seasons become much more extreme, while at lower tilts they become much more mild. A similar situation exists for earth’s rotational axis, which depending on which hemisphere is pointed at the sun during perihelion, can greatly impact the seasonal extremes between the two hemispheres.
Based on these different variables, Milankovitch was able to come up with a comprehensive mathematical model that is able to compute surface temperatures on earth going way back in time, and the conclusion is simple: Earth’s climate has always been changing, and is in a constant state of flux due to no fault of our own as human beings.
When Milankovitch first put forward his model, it went ignored for nearly half a century. Then, in 1976, a study published in the journal Science confirmed that Milankovitch’s theory is, in fact, accurate, and that it does correspond to various periods of climate change that have occurred throughout history.
In 1982, six years after this study was published, the National Research Council of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences adopted Milankovitch’s theory as truth, declaring that:
“… orbital variations remain the most thoroughly examined mechanism of climatic change on time scales of tens of thousands of years and are by far the clearest case of a direct effect of changing insolation on the lower atmosphere of Earth.”
If we had to sum the whole thing up in one simple phrase, it would be this: The biggest factor influencing weather and climate patterns on earth is the sun, period. Depending on the earth’s position to the sun at any given time, climate conditions are going to vary dramatically, and even create drastic abnormalities that defy everything that humans thought they knew about how the earth worked.
But rather than embrace this truth, today’s climate “scientists,” joined by leftist politicians and a complicit mainstream media, insist that not using reusable grocery bags at the supermarket and not having an electric vehicle are destroying the planet so quickly that we absolutely must implement global climate taxes as the solution.
“The climate change debate is not about science. It is an effort to impose political and economic controls on the population by the elite,” wrote one commenter at the Hal Turner Radio Show.
“And it’s another way to divide the population against itself, with some who believe in man-made global warming and some who don’t, i.e. divide and conquer.”
You can read the full Hal Turner Radio Show report at this link.
Sources for this article include:



* Why do we publish this?


  It is important to understand this information because it is partially supported by the ignorance of the people, that once dispelled, people now awake, with this knowledge in hand, can alert the public about the breach of trust and duty by the institutions  Law enforcement who already have a legal mandate to enforce the laws but refuse because they are part of the illegal activity.


  Published by Thenansehed through Joan Ashtar


  © misteri1963 this publication may be freely reproduced on condition that it respects its integrity and mentions the author, as a source of it and that this URL be included https://misteri1963.blogspot.com and the Copyright notice

11 de marzo de 2019

97% of scientists agree that climate change 'is a lie







March 11, 2019 by Cristina Valenzuela



In today's ridiculous battle over "real news" versus "false news" media liars established all claim that climate change is a perfect example of how the "false news" continues to interfere with true facts.
Again and again they say that 97% of scientists agree on climate change by man, and therefore anyone who disagrees is obviously a shovelful of "false" news.
But wait a second. Where really is the claim of "97%"? Yes they repeated a lot. Is it a legitimate representation of science?
The author Mark Steyn, immersed in that question in the search for a more authoritative answer. I wanted to find out   what is true and what is false  when the media tell their stories.
What he discovered was both fraud and deception by the propagandists of climate change compiled an entire book on the subject entitled  A disgrace to the profession  .
Here's an excerpt that explains the shocking intellectual fraud behind the claim "97% of scientists":
An opinion poll of earth scientists on global climate change was conducted by RK Margaret Zimmerman, MS, and published by the University of Illinois in 2008.
Apart from its support of Dr. Pantsdoumi, Mann often said the approval of the "established science": 97 percent of the world's scientists supposedly believe in the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming requires massive government intervention.
That percentage is derived from a survey conducted by a thesis by MRK Zimmerman.
The "survey" was one of two questions, the online questionnaire sent to 10,257 earth scientists, of which  [only] 3146 respondents  .
Scientists who responded, 96.2 percent came from North America.
Only 6.2 percent came from Canada. So America is overrepresented even within this sample of North America.
Nine percent of respondents in the United States are in California. So California is overrepresented not only within the US sample: has more than twice as large a part of the sample, such as Europe, Asia, Australia, the Pacific, Latin America and Africa together.
Ten percent of non-US respondents, Canada has 62 percent.
Not content with such a distorted sample, the researchers   selected 79 sample and declared "experts".
Of those 79 scientists, two were excluded from a second supplementary question. So 75 of 77 made it through to the final round, and 97.4 percent were found to agree with "consensus". That's where it comes from 97 percent.
So this is a "reconstruction" of Michael Mann: As a couple of Californian pines can determine the weather for a millennium, so  a couple of dozen of California scientists can determine the consensus of the world  .
However, compilers also invited comments from respondents and published in the appendices.
In terms of specific scientific material, hockey stick attracted three commentaries - one with positive smoothness, the other two not so much.

Well, that means the number consensus 97% comes from only 75 scientists were collected from a survey by email?

Yes. Of the hundreds of thousands of scientists in the world, only 75 of them were selected for the survey climate change that each organization of mainstream media news cites as fact.
Not the "established science" who have told him, right? In fact, it seems rather poor quality.
However, this is the kind of propaganda that passes as "real news", while anyone who questions the claims of the obviously flawed science says is  "false news".
So if "real news" is based on responses from a group tremendously distorted and misrepresented by scientists whose responses were compiled by a change "scientific" pro-climate that obviously alters the answers to suit your own subjective beliefs, ... first instead, how solid is the claimed authenticity of the news called as "real" authority?
Moreover, the idea that science is "settled" is anti-scientific.
Science is never really settled, because the heart of legitimate science is an openness to exploration, discovery and revolutions in new ideas that make obsolete the old ideas.
However, today, we are told by the Ministry of verifiers truth data and monopoly supplier of self-proclaimed "real news" that only their views are legitimate and no one else can even interrogate a "seated" set of beliefs .

"The consensus science" is not scientific by definition ... the reality is not decided by consensus of defective human beliefs.

Therefore, the focus of science claiming to be "approved" is, in itself, anti-scientific. Any set of alleged facts that can not withstand questioning, criticism or debate is not science at all.
However, stifle debate is precisely what the new brigade of "real news" is trying to achieve is the elimination of scientific dissent and alternative views.

15 de septiembre de 2017

ELITE IS USING CLIMATE WEAPONS AGAINST THE PLANET


"The Economist," the magazine of the Rothschild, presented on its cover July Trump with soaking feet under the sign "SWAMP 2"

Photo by: pantano 2


  • By Posesodegerasa, astillasderealidad.blogspot.com    
  •     View original
By Posesodegerasa, astillasderealidad.blogspot.comView original
We are witnessing with amazement a series of Atlantic hurricanes that are continuous and chained, in a way never seen before.
By Posesodegerasa, astillasderealidad.blogspot.comView original
We are witnessing with amazement a series of Atlantic hurricanes that are continuous and chained, in a way never seen before.
Does this mean that the Elite has devices to alter the climate?

The answer is "yes," and they themselves also give it back.

Since 1985 the Elite has the patent US-4686605-A, which registers the technology to alter a region of the Earth's atmosphere previously selected by polarized electromagnetic radiation.
Bernard J. Eastlund, father of HAARP technology
It was invented by Bernard J. Eastlund, who ceded the rights of its use to the company Apti Inc., contractor of the army of E.U.U.

In the final paragraph of the patent exhibition, published, once again, on a day 11 (August) we read the following:

"Climate modification is possible with this device, for example by altering the wind patterns of the upper atmosphere or by altering the solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more columns of atmospheric particles that would act as a lens or focusing device" .

Which implies that terrible atmospheric phenomena can be generated like hurricanes of the maximum power.

Like virtually any technology, it could be used for positive purposes, since it allows the elimination of greenhouse gases, such as carbon monoxide (as well as its artificial increase): "in addition to changing the molecular composition of a atmospheric region, you can choose a molecule or molecules to increase its presence.

In the same way can reduce gases like carbon monoxide, nitrogen and the like, favoring environmental improvement.
The Elite is modifying natural phenomena

This means no more or less that the elite could reduce the presence of the gases that cause their "climate change" in less than 24 hours.

But they prefer to keep the problem and increase it, rather than eradicate it, to take economic advantage of it.

Like so many other problems that could be eradicated at a stroke because it has the resources and the technology to do so.

But as we are governed by psychopaths with a thirst for unlimited power and control. prefer to "create problems" in order to maintain the suffering and tension of the population as a more effective method for global control.

(Source: http://dondelaverdadnoslleva.blogspot.com.es/)

Entrada destacada

PROYECTO EVACUACIÓN MUNDIAL POR EL COMANDO ASHTAR

SOY IBA OLODUMARE, CONOCIDO POR VOSOTROS COMO VUESTRO DIOS  Os digo hijos míos que el final de estos tiempos se aproximan.  Ningú...