Translate

Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Law and Justice. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta Law and Justice. Mostrar todas las entradas

23 de diciembre de 2018

Rumors Swirl As Mystery Firm Takes Fight With Mueller To Supreme Court


Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
A company owned by a foreign government which appears to be locked in a fierce battle with Special Counsel Robert Mueller has taken their case to the Supreme Court, according to a new legal filing presented Saturday to Chief Justice John Roberts.
The unidentified firm has asked the Supreme Court to block Mueller from obtaining records through a subpoena after a federal appeals court turned down the company's effort to block the court ordered release of documents. 
The identity of the firm and the foreign country at issue remain closely guarded secrets, but POLITICO first reported earlier this year that the dispute appeared to involve Mueller’s prosecutors. A POLITICO reporter was in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals clerk’s office in October when a person connected to the appeal arrived to request a copy of the special counsel’s latest filing in the case.
When the case was argued at the D.C. Circuit last week, the courtroom was closed to the public. Court personnel went to unusual lengths to preserve the secrecy, ordering journalists to leave the floor where lawyers were presenting their positions. -Politico
The court's public docket has offered few clues - containing no information on the parties or their attorneys. Tuesday, however, a three-page order revealed that the witness fighting the subpoena is a corporation owned by a foreign state.
The firm's argument that its status as an extension of a foreign government made it immune from subpoenas was rejected by a three-judge DC Circuit panel, while the judges were also unpersuaded by the state-owned company's claims that complying with the subpoena would violate laws in their home country. 
After the order was filed Tuesday, sealed filings continued in the appeals court in what appeared to be a bid to stay the D.C. Circuit’s ruling or appeal it further. On Friday, the appeals court denied a motion from the company. The precise nature of the motion was not disclosed. -Politico
The Supreme Court's online docket only reveals the request for a stay of the subpoena, and the fact that the company has asked to proceed under seal. 

5 de diciembre de 2018

Military Tribunals To Begin In January



  David Zublick Channel


Military Tribunals for Deep State traitors attempting to overthrow the Trump administration and those involved in child trafficking will begin in January. A secret meeting in Columbia, South Carolina has set plans in motion for what will finally be justice served to those who harm children and try to destroy our Republic, while former President George H.W. Bush was quietly executed for his crimes in a plea deal. David Zublick unseals the truth in this special report!

3 de noviembre de 2018

US antitrust law



Antitrust law of the United States  is a set of federal and state governmental laws governing the conduct and organization of commercial corporations, usually to promote a  competition  just  for the benefit of consumers  . (The concept is called competition law  in other English - speaking countries). The main statutes are the Sherman Act of 1890  , the  Clayton Act of 1914  and the  Law of the Federal Trade Commission 1914  . These Acts, first, restricting the formation of  cartels  and other collusive practices prohibit considered as a restriction on trade  . Second, restrict mergers and acquisitions. of organizations that could substantially lessen competition. Third, prohibit the creation of a monopoly and abuse of monopoly power. [one]

The  Federal Trade Commission  , the Department of Justice of  the  US. UU.  , State governments and private parties are sufficiently affected may file action in court to enforce antitrust laws. The scope of antitrust laws, and the degree to which should interfere with the freedom of a company to do business, or to protect small businesses, communities and consumers, are debated vigorously. One view, mainly associated with the "  Chicago school of economics "It suggests that antitrust laws should focus solely on the benefits for consumers and overall efficiency, while a wide range of legal and economic theories believes that the role of antitrust laws also controls economic power.  In the public interest.  [ two]


  •  (1)  For a general framework, see Thibault Schrepel, a new structured rule of reason approach for high - tech markets, Suffolk University Law Review, vol. 50, No. 1, 2017https://ssrn.com/abstract=2908838

  1. (2)   See generally,  Herbert Hovenkamp  , 'Chicago and Its Alternatives' (1986) 6 Duke Law Journal from 1014 to 1029, and  RH Bork  ,  The Antitrust Parish  (Free Press 1993)

31 de agosto de 2018

Donald Trump Threatens to ‘Get Involved’ if Justice Department Fails to ‘Straighten Out’

Donald Trump Threatens to ‘Get Involved’ if Justice Department Fails to ‘Straighten Out’



President Donald Trump arrives for a campaign rally at the Ford Center, Thursday, Aug. 30, 2018, in Evansville, Ind.
AP Photo/Evan Vucci

20 de agosto de 2018

Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.
I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.
I hereby determine and order:
Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:
(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;
(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;
(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:
(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or
(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;
(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:
(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader’s or official’s tenure; or
(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and
(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:
(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:
(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;
(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;
(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or
(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.
(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.
Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).
Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.
Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.
Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.
Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.
Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.
Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).
Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.
Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 20, 2017.

ANNEX
1. Mukhtar Hamid Shah; Date of Birth (DOB) August 11, 1939; alt. DOB November 8, 1939; nationality, Pakistan
2. Angel Rondon Rijo; DOB July 16, 1950; nationality, Dominican Republic
3. Dan Gertler; DOB December 23, 1973; nationality, Israel; alt. nationality, Democratic Republic of the Congo
4. Maung Maung Soe; DOB March 1964; nationality, Burma
5. Yahya Jammeh; DOB May 25, 1965; nationality, The Gambia
6. Sergey Kusiuk; DOB December 1, 1966; nationality, Ukraine; alt. nationality, Russia
7. Benjamin Bol Mel; DOB January 3, 1978; alt. DOB December 24, 1978; nationality, South Sudan; alt. nationality, Sudan
8. Julio Antonio Juárez Ramírez; DOB December 1, 1980; nationality, Guatemala
9. Goulnora Islamovna Karimova; DOB July 8, 1972; nationality, Uzbekistan
10. Slobodan Tesic; DOB December 21, 1958; nationality, Serbia
11. Artem Yuryevich Chayka; DOB September 25, 1975; nationality, Russia
12. Gao Yan; DOB April 1963; nationality, China
13. Roberto Jose Rivas Reyes; DOB July 6, 1954; nationality, Nicaragua

17 de agosto de 2018

The house of the messes


It is well known: some are born with star and other, stellate. Judge Llarena case, this honest judge forged in the most rancid Franco prosapia, according to which the mere fact advocate for the independence of Catalonia is already a crime.Incomprehensibly, it is not characterized as such, but one that comes in handy: the "rebellion". the requirement of violence Llarena has tried to prove with an imaginative interpretation of the concept according to which I lack is violent acts by peaceful it is, which gives rise to violence.

And they are surprised that someone (President Puigdemont and four exconsellers in exile) bring a civil lawsuit that has been deprived of their rights arbitrarily. It's the least they could expect. With the corresponding summons the judge Llarena to testify on 4 September. The Spanish justice has not responded to the summons. The chief judge returns, invoking procedural defect. To therefore legal means. But open politics because the same chief judge informs the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) the summons and it requires granting protection to Llarena and a warning to the Belgian justice on the independence of the Spanish justice.

The CGPJ has been mobilized and the Permanent Commission voted seven grant under the judge against one. Justified with reasons of political rather than legal background; even passionately he describes as "crude maneuver" to  subdue the sovereignty of the Spanish State to a foreign jurisdiction . Pure doctrine of reason of state. Nothing to do with justice. The proof is that the same body entrusted with the ministries of the Spanish government to stand up for the aforementioned sovereignty and independence of Llarena.

But, in turn, amparo What materializes? You admit that the judge did not go to a subpoena from a foreign country? Not be the case, but incomparecer, the Belgian court could issue an indictment of some sort. The mess they've organized Llarena and fogosa numen, Saenz de Santamaria is monumental. Not that the Spanish justice is discredited in Europe; It is that it is his laughingstock.

The consequence of this monstrosity prison and street gangs fascist aggression is to make final the Catalan Republic.


Copyright © misteri1963 All rights reserved. You can copy and distribute this article provided you do not modify in any way the content remains complete, credit is given to the author and include this URL https: // misteri1963.blogspot.com and Copyright notice 

14 de agosto de 2018

BREAKING NEWS INTERNATIONAL CRIMES TRIBUNAL FOR CHURCH AND STATE. (ITCCS)

Marco Herguz Hermesoy

 44 minuts
ITCCS.ORG.  International Tribunal for Crimes of Church and State.
Posted on August 12, 2018 by Kevin
Our mandate:
💥 (1) legally prosecute persons and institutions responsible for exploitation, trafficking, torture and murder of children, past and present , and
💥 (2) To stop these and other criminal actions by the church and state, even desestableciendo those same institutions.
⚠️ The Brussels court issued summary judgment against Jorge Bergoglio and other members of the Ninth Circle;
⚠️ The "palace coup" in the Vatican can interrupt the Irish papal visit as arrest teams converge on a common law Dublin "militarized"
Brussels, Rome, Dublin
A European court issued a summary judgment against twelve members charged with the sacrificial cult of the Ninth Circle after none of the defendants contested the criminal charges against them. The "Pope Francisco" Jorge Bergoglio, is named in the Judgment of August 10 the International Court of Justice based in Brussels, which reads in part:
"By refusing to answer the summons of the Court, the defendants declare their implicit pro - confessed guilt, as if they had confessed to the charges against them. Consequently, the judgment requested by the plaintiffs is granted, and the twelve defendants convicted of a monstrous criminal conspiracy to kidnap, trafficking, torture and murder children ritually. hereby a warrant for the arrest and imprisonment of the accused immediately before final judgment is issued ".
In addition to Jorge Bergoglio, members of the doomed cult I include Irish Catholic Cardinal Sean Brady and Archbishop Diarmuid Martin, secretary of the Vatican State Pietro Parolin, prominent politicians and European businessmen and two senior officials of the World Council of Churches, including Mark MacDonald Anglican bishop of Canada. 
(For a complete list of culprits, see the publication of July 12, 2018 in  www.itccs.org  )
The decision of the Court, which convicted and successfully deposed the former Pope Benedict crimes against humanity in February 2013, sent shock waves through the immediate Vatican. A source within the Curia, the Roman College of Cardinals, says Cardinal Francis Arinze of Nigeria is now the frontrunner in imminent "palace coup" that will eliminate the pope Francisco / Jorge Bergoglio in the coming weeks, despite the next papal visit to Ireland on 25 August.
In Dublin, tensions are rising as two independent teams of common law bailiffs are prepared to enforce standing orders arrest Pope Francis / Bergoglio. Gardai police has blocked the city in response. Observers describe the "militarized" environment in Ireland, the imprisonment of low-income families in police stations after their eviction by owners hoping to benefit from the influx of tourists and police harassment against demonstrators and activists common law, including the issuance of a so-called "terrorist watch list".
According to ITCCS headquarters, which is coordinating the actions of the sheriffs who arrested,
"Despite the massive security around Bergoglio, we are confident that an arrest will be made. Fortunately, we will have the support of elements within the papal party itself, as well as sympathetic officials Gardai. We are taking full advantage of factional fighting between Ratzinger and Bergoglio fields within the Curia ".
http://itccs.org/ ... / brussels-court-issues-summary-judgment ... / 
I share with consciousness and love !!

Copyright © misteri1963 all rights reserved. You can copy and distribute this article as long as you do not modify it in any way, the content remains complete, the author will be credited and this URL https: // mysi1963.blogspot.com and the Copyright notice

Entrada destacada

PROYECTO EVACUACIÓN MUNDIAL POR EL COMANDO ASHTAR

SOY IBA OLODUMARE, CONOCIDO POR VOSOTROS COMO VUESTRO DIOS  Os digo hijos míos que el final de estos tiempos se aproximan.  Ningú...