THE COMPLAINT OF THE "FAKE NEWS" EXCUSE TO MUZZLE FREE INFORMATION (PART 2)
The report Christopher Steele
During the previous presidential election campaign in the United States, Hillary Clinton team instructed the former agent of the British secret services Christopher Steele an investigation into the candidate Donald Trump.
Former head of "Russian Bureau" of MI6, Christopher Steele is known for his outrageous and always unverifiable claims.
After accusing Vladimir Putin without pruebas- to have ordered the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210, also she accused him of having brought down to Donald Trump in a sexual trap to blackmail him.
The Steele Report was discreetly given to certain journalists, politicians and spies before being published.
Hence comes the current thesis that, trying to get his puppet win the election and prevent the election of Hillary Clinton, the master of the Kremlin ordered "their" media buying advertising on Facebook and disclosure by the way of calumny against former secretary of State hypothesis now come to be confirmed by a conversation the ambassador of Australia in London with a counselor Donald Trump.
Although it has been proven that Russia Today and Sputnik did not spend more than a few thousand dollars in advertising, also had little to do with Mrs. Clinton, the American ruling class says he is convinced that that was enough to reverse the support he had enjoyed the Democratic candidate, who spent his campaign 1 200 million.
In Washington still it believes that technological inventions allow such a degree of manipulation of human beings.
It is no longer about whether Donald Trump note that and his supporters campaigned through Facebook was because all written and audiovisual press was hostile, but to assert that Russia manipulated Facebook to prevent the election of a favorite of Washington.
The legal privilege of Google, Facebook and Twitter
In its efforts to demonstrate the interference of Moscow, the American press has highlighted the enormous privilege enjoyed by Google, Facebook and Twitter. These 3 companies are not held responsible for the content they broadcast.
From the point of view of US law are just "carriers" (common carrier) information.
Experiments by Facebook have shown, on the one hand, it is possible to create collective emotions.
But the company is not considered legally responsible for the contents it projects, contradiction highlights the existence of an anomaly in the system.
Especially considering that the privilege of Google, Facebook and Twitter is clearly inappropriate.
Indeed, these three companies operate in at least two ways to modify the contents "transport".
First, unilaterally censor certain messages, either by direct intervention of staff or by undisguised use of algorithms.
But also promote their own version of the truth at the expense of the other views (fact-checking).
For example, in 2012, he commissioned Qatar Google Ideas, and under the command of Jared Cohen, the creation of a computer program capable of following the defections in the Syrian Arab Army.
Objective? Show that Syria was a dictatorship and that the people had started a "revolution". But it quickly turned out that this view of things was false. The amount of desertions never went from 25 000 in an army which has 450 000 men. Is why, after having promoted this software, Google ended quietly withdrawing.
On the other hand, Google touted, for 7 years, items that echo the statements of the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights (OSDH) are made.
These statements give, day after day, the exact number of victims on both sides. But they are imaginary figures because it is physically impossible to determine that amount daily.
It never has been, in wartime, a state daily able to determine the exact number of soldiers killed in combat and civilian casualties.
But the OSDH know, from the UK, which no one is able to determine accurately in Syria itself.
Gerard Collomb
Far from being "carriers" of information, Google, Facebook and Twitter are actually their creators and therefore should be legally responsible for their content.
The rules of freedom of expression
Even considering that the efforts of NATO and the President Macron against Russia in the audiovisual and internet plan are doomed to failure, the fact remains that it is best that new media are included in the general law.
The principles governing freedom of expression are legitimate only if they are the same for all citizens and for all media.
The latter is not the case at this time.
While there is an application of the general law, there are, however, specific rules, such as the right of reply or denial regarding, for messages that are disseminated through the Internet and social networks.
As always in the history of information, the media and trying to sabotage established new ones.
I remember, for example, the editorial virulent than French newspaper Le Monde, in 2002 dedicated to my work, published online on the attacks of September 11, 2001.
What displeases Le Monde, as well as my conclusions about these events is that the Voltaire Network is not subject to a number of financial obligations which the prisoner felt everyday.
Fifteen years later, Le Monde shows the same attitude advocate of a clan with the creation of what he calls Le Décodex.
Rather than criticize the articles and videos of the new media, Le Monde aims to measure the degree of reliability of the web sites that rival theirs.
Of course, you just seem reliable websites of newspapers that are published on paper, such as Le Monde own while everyone else classifies them as unreliable.
To justify the campaign against social networks, the Jean-Jaures Foundation -Foundation the French Socialist Party linked to the NED (National Endowment for Democracy) estadounidense- just published an imaginary poll.
This survey tries to show, exposing a series of figures that frustrated people, the working classes and supporters of the National Front are gullible people.
According to that survey, 79% of French believe in any conspiracy theory.
As proof of his ingenuity, the survey states that 9% of the French are convinced that the earth is flat.
Actually, neither I nor any of my French friends consulted through internet we've never met a fellow who believed that the Earth is flat.
It is simply an invented figure, enough for anyone to doubt the study.
What is certain is that, despite being linked to the Socialist Party of France, Jean-Jaures Foundation has always had as general secretary Gerard Collomb, now become interior minister by French President Emmanuel Macron.
This same foundation had already published two years ago, a study to discredit political opponents of the system, calling them "conspiracy".
The report Christopher Steele
During the previous presidential election campaign in the United States, Hillary Clinton team instructed the former agent of the British secret services Christopher Steele an investigation into the candidate Donald Trump.
Former head of "Russian Bureau" of MI6, Christopher Steele is known for his outrageous and always unverifiable claims.
After accusing Vladimir Putin without pruebas- to have ordered the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210, also she accused him of having brought down to Donald Trump in a sexual trap to blackmail him.
The Steele Report was discreetly given to certain journalists, politicians and spies before being published.
Hence comes the current thesis that, trying to get his puppet win the election and prevent the election of Hillary Clinton, the master of the Kremlin ordered "their" media buying advertising on Facebook and disclosure by the way of calumny against former secretary of State hypothesis now come to be confirmed by a conversation the ambassador of Australia in London with a counselor Donald Trump.
Although it has been proven that Russia Today and Sputnik did not spend more than a few thousand dollars in advertising, also had little to do with Mrs. Clinton, the American ruling class says he is convinced that that was enough to reverse the support he had enjoyed the Democratic candidate, who spent his campaign 1 200 million.
In Washington still it believes that technological inventions allow such a degree of manipulation of human beings.
It is no longer about whether Donald Trump note that and his supporters campaigned through Facebook was because all written and audiovisual press was hostile, but to assert that Russia manipulated Facebook to prevent the election of a favorite of Washington.
The legal privilege of Google, Facebook and Twitter
In its efforts to demonstrate the interference of Moscow, the American press has highlighted the enormous privilege enjoyed by Google, Facebook and Twitter. These 3 companies are not held responsible for the content they broadcast.
From the point of view of US law are just "carriers" (common carrier) information.
Experiments by Facebook have shown, on the one hand, it is possible to create collective emotions.
But the company is not considered legally responsible for the contents it projects, contradiction highlights the existence of an anomaly in the system.
Especially considering that the privilege of Google, Facebook and Twitter is clearly inappropriate.
Indeed, these three companies operate in at least two ways to modify the contents "transport".
First, unilaterally censor certain messages, either by direct intervention of staff or by undisguised use of algorithms.
But also promote their own version of the truth at the expense of the other views (fact-checking).
For example, in 2012, he commissioned Qatar Google Ideas, and under the command of Jared Cohen, the creation of a computer program capable of following the defections in the Syrian Arab Army.
Objective? Show that Syria was a dictatorship and that the people had started a "revolution". But it quickly turned out that this view of things was false. The amount of desertions never went from 25 000 in an army which has 450 000 men. Is why, after having promoted this software, Google ended quietly withdrawing.
On the other hand, Google touted, for 7 years, items that echo the statements of the Syrian Observatory of Human Rights (OSDH) are made.
These statements give, day after day, the exact number of victims on both sides. But they are imaginary figures because it is physically impossible to determine that amount daily.
It never has been, in wartime, a state daily able to determine the exact number of soldiers killed in combat and civilian casualties.
But the OSDH know, from the UK, which no one is able to determine accurately in Syria itself.
Gerard Collomb
The rules of freedom of expression
Even considering that the efforts of NATO and the President Macron against Russia in the audiovisual and internet plan are doomed to failure, the fact remains that it is best that new media are included in the general law.
The principles governing freedom of expression are legitimate only if they are the same for all citizens and for all media.
The latter is not the case at this time.
While there is an application of the general law, there are, however, specific rules, such as the right of reply or denial regarding, for messages that are disseminated through the Internet and social networks.
As always in the history of information, the media and trying to sabotage established new ones.
I remember, for example, the editorial virulent than French newspaper Le Monde, in 2002 dedicated to my work, published online on the attacks of September 11, 2001.
What displeases Le Monde, as well as my conclusions about these events is that the Voltaire Network is not subject to a number of financial obligations which the prisoner felt everyday.
Fifteen years later, Le Monde shows the same attitude advocate of a clan with the creation of what he calls Le Décodex.
Rather than criticize the articles and videos of the new media, Le Monde aims to measure the degree of reliability of the web sites that rival theirs.
Of course, you just seem reliable websites of newspapers that are published on paper, such as Le Monde own while everyone else classifies them as unreliable.
To justify the campaign against social networks, the Jean-Jaures Foundation -Foundation the French Socialist Party linked to the NED (National Endowment for Democracy) estadounidense- just published an imaginary poll.
This survey tries to show, exposing a series of figures that frustrated people, the working classes and supporters of the National Front are gullible people.
According to that survey, 79% of French believe in any conspiracy theory.
As proof of his ingenuity, the survey states that 9% of the French are convinced that the earth is flat.
Actually, neither I nor any of my French friends consulted through internet we've never met a fellow who believed that the Earth is flat.
It is simply an invented figure, enough for anyone to doubt the study.
What is certain is that, despite being linked to the Socialist Party of France, Jean-Jaures Foundation has always had as general secretary Gerard Collomb, now become interior minister by French President Emmanuel Macron.
This same foundation had already published two years ago, a study to discredit political opponents of the system, calling them "conspiracy".
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No se admiten comentarios con datos personales como teléfonos, direcciones o publicidad encubierta