Is the IMF humanized?

Is the IMF humanized or does it not have another so that a Revolution does not break out?

Proposes the Universal Income that we propose MAY and + Taxes for the Rich

No, there is simply no other left for the capitalist zombie economy.

So that everything does not come down and be able to keep the crisis scam and the crack that underlies everything ... bag, debt, derivatives, etc, and so that the same Zionists who created bankruptcy can follow the donkey ... both Japan, the US and the EU stand up to print money ...

if this is so, how can we not spare a little more so that people can continue to live even if it is based on public alms and thus avoid a revolution? 
In terms of collecting more taxes from the rich, it is in line with Zionist globalization, which is to not allow countries to develop more than just enough so that they can continue to be dominated by the United States.

Remember when money was flowing happily all over the world, Spain not only overtook Italy but allowed itself to buy companies or banks around the world. The crisis brought about such scarcity of money that makes the poorest people unable to raise their heads. I also said that the Zionists had leveraged in tax havens almost 70 billion dollars ... enough to dominate the world for a century and that they are not interested in new riches or more wealth .... so this break in the credit, the only engine for growth in capitalism. This tax to the rich would be to curb the wealth and power of the new rich, not to redistribute what has already been stolen by the previous ones ... those Benefits Billonarios that in a long time will not be generated again.

Armak of Odelot

Universal Basic Income Slows in IMF Debates

• www.rebelion.org
• View all deals
• October 13th, 2017
• 
  

- Inequality has increased in more than half of the countries during the last three decades, including in Spain

- The agency argues that the tax burden can be increased without damaging economic growth.

The IMF has started its annual fall meeting in Washington. EFE.

The need for a universal basic income (RBU), a monthly income insuredby the mere fact of being a citizen, regardless of income or employment status, has been cast in the debates of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). 

With all the caution - the authors of the report say that neither advise nor advise - the IMF admits that this income is a possibility that should be examined in response to the "radical uncertainty"that represents the increasing robotization of jobs and inequality.

The Director of the Department of Fiscal Affairs of the Fund, the Portuguese Vítor Gaspar,explained in the presentation of the last edition of the report "Fiscal Monitor" that the universal basic income "is one of several ideas that could be examined in response to this increasing uncertainty to the pace of economic growth. "

While they recognize the potential of this income to significantly reduce inequality and poverty, they also remember that their cost would be high. 

And the idea of ​​the IMF is that its introduction should be "neutral" from the budgetary point of view, that is, "coexist with other fiscal priorities" such as infrastructure, education or health. 

"Should it replace non-efficient and equitable public spending , and would it be financed by progressive or indirect taxation?" , asked the former Portuguese Finance Minister, without giving a reply himself.

In any case, he recalled that some experiences with money transfers in certain populations of Latin America have given positive results.

Tax Rise to High Rents

The report presented Wednesday in Washington stresses that inequality has increased in more than half of the countries during the last three decades, mainly among the citizens of the advanced economies. 

Among the countries where income inequality has grown most is Spain. 

In these countries fiscal policy manages to compensate up to a third of inequalities , especially through the so-called transfers, such as education and health.

In this context, the IMF notes that it is possible to increase the degree of tax progressivity while preserving growth. 

In particular, it stresses how the progressivity of income tax declined significantly in the 1980s, and has remained practically stable ever since. 

Specifically, Gaspar has explained that the average maximum rate of IRPF in OECD countries has gone from an average of 62% in 1981 to 35% in 2015. 

"Our empirical results suggest that it is possible to raise the degree of fiscal progressivity by preserving growth, at least with degrees of escalation that are not excessive." 

That is, it is possible to raise the maximum rate of income tax among the richest in case it does not affect growth. 

In the case of Spain, the maximum rate of IRPF is 45%.

In addition, the IMF report recalls that tax systems are less progressive than the data show because the rich have greater access to mechanisms to reduce tax payments. 

And it also refers to the need to explore certain taxes on wealth.

Spending on education and health

The report has a third leg, referring to spending on education and health,whose access has become increasingly unequal in terms of population incomes in developed countries, warns the IMF. 

"For example, in advanced economies, men with a university education live 14 years longer than average those with a secondary education or less," the statement said.

In addition, the Fund says closing the gap in inequality in basic health coverage could raise life expectancy by an average of 1.3 years in emerging and developing countries.

"We hope to have persuaded that fiscal policy can make a difference in the fight against inequality, and that efficiency and equity must go hand in hand," the report concludes.

Source:  http://www.eldiario.es/economia/Basica-Universal-Monetario-Internacional-FMI_0_696081157.html