Former undersecretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, in his new article explains why the actions of the current US authorities make the country a real Mordor.
This compared to the fictional country of Tolkien's saga, Roberts recalls that one of your readers asked why the neoconservatives promote nuclear war as this kind of armed conflict will not leave anyone alive. According to political scientist, US neoconservatives believe they can win a war without suffering any damage.
His "insane plan" is to surround Russia and China with anti - ballistic missile bases to establish a shield against the reciprocal measures that could undertake Moscow and Beijing. In addition, these US military installations could be equipped with nuclear missiles, Russia and China without knowing it .
"This will reduce the warning time five minutes, leaving victims to Washington shortly to make a decision"
His "insane plan" is to surround Russia and China with anti - ballistic missile bases to establish a shield against the reciprocal measures that could undertake Moscow and Beijing. In addition, these US military installations could be equipped with nuclear missiles, Russia and China without knowing it .
"This will reduce the warning time five minutes, leaving victims to Washington shortly to make a decision"
The neocons are convinced that Washington's first attack will cause much damage to the capabilities of Russian and Chinese retaliation that both governments will surrender instead of launching attacks in response. Thus, leaders in Moscow and Beijing will conclude that they have little chance that their ICBMs are able to overcome the US shield.
Moreover, a weak retaliation would just cause a second wave of nuclear attack from Washington to erase Russian and Chinese cities, kill millions of people, leaving both countries in ruins.
"In short, the warmongering Americans are betting that the Russian and Chinese authorities hand over their weapons rather than run the risk of being completely destroyed , " he says.
According to the expert, the neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack."However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington .
So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war."
" It is reckless and irresponsible risk life onthe planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack." However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington . So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack." However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington . So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. It could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. It could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits.
Moreover, a weak retaliation would just cause a second wave of nuclear attack from Washington to erase Russian and Chinese cities, kill millions of people, leaving both countries in ruins.
"In short, the warmongering Americans are betting that the Russian and Chinese authorities hand over their weapons rather than run the risk of being completely destroyed , " he says.
According to the expert, the neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack."However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington .
So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war."
" It is reckless and irresponsible risk life onthe planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack." However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington . So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. neoconservatives are "wicked enough to launch a preemptive nuclear attack." However, it could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington . So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. It could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. It could also be that your plan has the objective of creating such conditions for Russia and China, the authorities of both countries begin to believe that "the fate gives them back" and, therefore, must accept the dominance of Washington. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands. However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits. So, to feel secure its hegemony, Washington will have to order Moscow and Beijing disarm, Roberts stands.However, this plan "is full of risks" because "miscalculations are always a feature of the war." " It is reckless and irresponsible risk life on the planet just to the hegemony of Washington , " he admits.
Thus, the neocon plan puts them at high risk to Europe, UK, Japan, South Korea and Australia in the case of Russia and China decide to retaliate. Washington shield willnot be able to protect Europe from nuclear cruise missiles Russian Air Force and therefore "Europe will cease to exist."Beijing's response would hit Japan, South Korea and Australia.
Russians, like all sensible people have the hope that "the vassals of Washington understand that it is they who are at risk - a risk which have nothing to gain and everything to lose - , disavow their vassalage and US bases eliminate "says Roberts.
"
They should be clear to European politicians who are being dragged into a conflict with Russia , "he stresses. In addition, the author recalls that recently the NATO commander told the US Congress that it needs more funds for the military presence in Europe with the to contain the 'resurgent Russia. "
According to Roberts, the' resurgent Russia 'implies that the Slavic country is strong enough and confident to defend their interests and those of its allies. for example, Moscow was able to" block Syria planned invasion of Barack Obama and the bombing of Iran as well as allowing Syrian forces defeated Daesh terrorist - organization banned in Russia and other countries, which was sent by Obama and Hillary Clinton to overthrow Assad.
"He '
Russians, like all sensible people have the hope that "the vassals of Washington understand that it is they who are at risk - a risk which have nothing to gain and everything to lose - , disavow their vassalage and US bases eliminate "says Roberts.
"
They should be clear to European politicians who are being dragged into a conflict with Russia , "he stresses. In addition, the author recalls that recently the NATO commander told the US Congress that it needs more funds for the military presence in Europe with the to contain the 'resurgent Russia. "
According to Roberts, the' resurgent Russia 'implies that the Slavic country is strong enough and confident to defend their interests and those of its allies. for example, Moscow was able to" block Syria planned invasion of Barack Obama and the bombing of Iran as well as allowing Syrian forces defeated Daesh terrorist - organization banned in Russia and other countries, which was sent by Obama and Hillary Clinton to overthrow Assad.
"He '
This ability to Moscow is a challenge to the neo - conservative doctrine, proposed by former Undersecretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz, that is the idea of global US supremacy and preventing the resurgence of a new rival able to exercise control over Washington's unilateral actions.
While neoconservatives "were engrossed in wars style 'cakewalk' (referring to a dance developed by American slaves who mimicked the behavior of their masters), which have already lasted 16 years , " -Moscow and its rivals emerged as Beijing- drivers unilateralism that Washington had enjoyed since the disintegration of the USSR.
" What Washington is trying to do is regain its capacity to act worldwide without any restriction of any other country. This requires that Russia and China are withdrawn, "Roberts deepens.
While neoconservatives "were engrossed in wars style 'cakewalk' (referring to a dance developed by American slaves who mimicked the behavior of their masters), which have already lasted 16 years , " -Moscow and its rivals emerged as Beijing- drivers unilateralism that Washington had enjoyed since the disintegration of the USSR.
" What Washington is trying to do is regain its capacity to act worldwide without any restriction of any other country. This requires that Russia and China are withdrawn, "Roberts deepens.
The governments of both countries have a "moral conscience that lacks entirely to Washington , " he says. Also, "neither intimidated by Western propaganda". The author quotes the words of Russian Foreign Minister Serguéi Lavrov, who said that "endless hysterical accusations against Russia are always empty of any evidence heard."
It is likely that Russia and China to sacrifice its sovereignty for the sake of life on Earth.However, while the "moral conscience of the two drive them to oppose evil played by Washington in order not to succumb to this evil , " says the author.
"I think the evil that governs in Washington is carrying US and its vassals to the total destruction countries , " he says.
Having convinced the Russians and Chinese leaders that Washington intends to bomb their countries in a surprise attack, the question is: how will respond Russia and China? Will they sit and wait for an attack?Or prevent the attack Washington with an own attack?
Roberts reminds readers that their name is on the list of 'Russian agents'. For him, being 'Russian agent' is "respect international law and life", which does not respect the Washington itself. It also means " torespond to provocations with diplomacy and requests for cooperation, which Washington can not do."
"Clearly a 'Russian agent' is a moral person who wants to preserve life and national identity and dignity of other people , " he stresses.
It is likely that Russia and China to sacrifice its sovereignty for the sake of life on Earth.However, while the "moral conscience of the two drive them to oppose evil played by Washington in order not to succumb to this evil , " says the author.
"I think the evil that governs in Washington is carrying US and its vassals to the total destruction countries , " he says.
Having convinced the Russians and Chinese leaders that Washington intends to bomb their countries in a surprise attack, the question is: how will respond Russia and China? Will they sit and wait for an attack?Or prevent the attack Washington with an own attack?
Roberts reminds readers that their name is on the list of 'Russian agents'. For him, being 'Russian agent' is "respect international law and life", which does not respect the Washington itself. It also means " torespond to provocations with diplomacy and requests for cooperation, which Washington can not do."
"Clearly a 'Russian agent' is a moral person who wants to preserve life and national identity and dignity of other people , " he stresses.
Thus, Roberts is presented as an "agent of all people who disapprove of Washington's willingness to use nuclear war to establish its hegemony over the world."
According to the author, Washington wants to "put human morality and become the master of the planet."
"Washington is no doubt Sauron. The only important question is whether there well enough in the world to resist and overcome evil of Washington , " he concludes.
According to the author, Washington wants to "put human morality and become the master of the planet."
"Washington is no doubt Sauron. The only important question is whether there well enough in the world to resist and overcome evil of Washington , " he concludes.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No se admiten comentarios con datos personales como teléfonos, direcciones o publicidad encubierta