Definitely yes. And the reasons come from this same institution called by serious analysts as the Ministry of Colonies, mainly because of its vassal how to proceed in America, obeying in most decisions the US government.
Its origin is the American Conference of Bogota in 1948 with the aim of developing democracy and continental freedom from effective targeting of Washington.
However, it stands in its history silence before military dictatorships, gentle strokes, regarding enforced disappearances and killings of journalists, political and social leaders, their support for neoliberalism, drug trafficking, military bases and economic wars, in an interventionist and coup process.
 |
| HONDURAS |
The first flag of the extreme right in the OAS was the right to freedom of expression, enriched with an arsenal of private communication media which manipulate reality with impunity.
Significantly, its position in Punta del Este, Uruguay, in January 1962, where Ernesto Guevara Commander USA denounced for its constant destabilization of the Cuban revolution and attempts to invade the country; also by the policy of domestication of Latin America, a position that led to the expulsion of Cuba from the body and the breaking of diplomatic relations with it in all member nations except Mexico.
This permanent benefit obtained American elites of the OAS is underscored by the complicit silence in the overthrow of the president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz, the Bay of Pigs invasion in April 1961 and the landing of US Marines in the Dominican Republic in 1965 (1 ).
It highlights the "neutrality" against the British invasion of Las Malvinas (1982), the assassination of Prime Minister of Grenada, Maurice Bishop, in 1983, looking away in armed conflicts in Central America and to the invasion of Panama in 1989 again . the OAS stopped knowing Operation Condor, a plan organized by the CIA to destroy sovereignty and establish dictatorships affecting Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Ecuador, where murder, disappearance and mutilation, were tools of repression they dismantled the democratic opposition.
Venezuela seems to be in this century the country to destabilize as the Organization of American States did not condemn the coup and scheduled chaos in April 2002, nor in 2014, nor bachaquera violence, suggesting activation of the Democratic Charter of OAS in order to isolate this nation endorsing the brutal economic war that fosters conflict, shortages, hoarding, smuggling, violent leadership, paramilitarism and invasion (2).
Three facts are important to analyze: one in June 2009 the General Assembly of the OAS, held in San Pedro Sula, Honduras, eliminated the resolution in 1962 expelled Cuba from that forum, holding the incompatibility of Marxism-Leninism with the Ibero - American system and the alignment with the communist bloc broke the unity and solidarity of the hemisphere, which corroborates the intransigent ideology of Washington. Two, the OAS was, is and will be an instrument of imperialist domination and no reform could change their nature, nor its history, why Cuba will never return, Fidel Castro wrote.
Three, Latin America should bet on regional integration mechanisms where complementarity, respect and solidarity are the principles for relations among peoples. Possibly the most dignified attitude would contempt all its resolutions represent a single country, the United States, which would show who is subject politically as organ of power, persistently denouncing his atrocious history of "infidelities" with truth, democracy and social justice in America.
Perhaps the Democratic Charter
It should apply to countries that have suffered a bloody civil war or repression
such as Mexico, Colombia, Honduras, Paraguay , among others;
apply to neoliberal governments that sponsor the "soft" blows or violent
as Honduras, Paraguay and Brazil;
apply to the violation of economic rights
as in Peru, Argentina and Chile;
applied to the bloody dictatorships of the seventies, which were never excluded from this body.
With regard to Almagro , recognized official ultra right holds the position of Secretary General, it is not necessary to speak as their persecutor role Venezuela has become their main task, obviously sharing the indications given by the Pentagon and leading the limit the role of the organization as an ideological instrument of the big dominant elites in Latin America.
As has been proven, it has not been the OAS an autonomous and sovereign body which has made strong actions in support of popular governments. On the contrary, following the orders of the US government has always attacked the nations that have launched projects of social independence.
One might wonder whether the position of the National Assembly of Nicaragua, which unanimously rejected the bill Nica Act 2 that drives the US Congress to control the financing from multilateral banks, would be accepted by the representatives of the OAS, especially under the White House argument according to which in this Central American nation there is no democracy and is a country vulnerable to money laundering.
The answer is obvious.
http://www.hispantv.com/noticias/opinion/339315/disolver-oea-neoliberalismo-eeuu
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No se admiten comentarios con datos personales como teléfonos, direcciones o publicidad encubierta