MENSAJE DEL ARCÁNGEL METATRÓN - EL RETORNO DE CRISTO Y LA LLAMADA DE MARÍA

中国建立一个新的世界秩序

中国建立一个新的世界秩序

在他对天空新闻专栏作家凯蒂·斯托拉德新文章思考什么中国有可能影响公司在国际舞台上崛起。

笔者   注意到   ，在上世纪80年代“引领中国回到世界后”，邓·克西亚平开始鼓励这大致翻译作为外交政策的“隐藏你的光，等待你的时刻。”

这是一个时期的改革开放：中国是弱，差，有很多的理由恢复。因此，据笔者，这是有道理的“保持低调，在国际舞台上”。

“似乎已经溪·金平左躲和等待”斯托拉德说。

当胡锦涛走进人民在北京人民大会堂宣传他的新举措   丝绸之路   国际论坛14日和15日举行的框架，“没有任何道歉或他们的行为指涉”。

取而代之的是，溪·金平似乎已经决定，现在是时候当中国“立场坚定，表现出自身，但坚持认为并没有威胁他的力量和可能在世界正义的力量”。

因此，根据笔者，这个亚洲巨人的领导者必须说服邻国，甚至没有在纠纷涉及territoriales-“他们有恃无恐，一切从中国的崛起，以获得”。

此外，北京有责任保证华盛顿不打算取代他在“树顶”，而是寻求“和平共处”。因此，总统通常表征国家而言放心，不回潮-危险。

据斯托拉德，当溪·金平谈到外交政策，我喜欢提“的新型国际关系的”和“相互尊重”和“互利合作”。

“换句话说，中国不再希望在以美国为首的国际秩序中发挥的第二个角色，并希望在你把她当成一个平等的新秩序，并承诺善待他人以同样的方式，”我说的作者。

通过给对丝绸之路的新经济带，他们的意见，中国领导人选择了十五世纪的海军上将，茨·赫，就是我形容为“一个先驱，而不是一个征服者，谁会记住作为友好使者的例子”。

在这种情况下，斯托拉德继续说，“海军上将X1是他的宝帆船沿丝绸之路分享它在基础设施的新投资的形式。”

然而，据笔者，没有G7的领导者，意大利外，出席北京峰会。

这位记者回忆说，在2014年中国溪·金平与比较“睡狮，这将动摇世界当你醒来。”

“今天狮子是清醒的，但它是安宁，舒适，文明”

来源：   https://mundo.sputniknews.com/asia/201705161069203578-china-ascenso-leon/

China builds a new world order

In his new article for Sky News columnist Katie Stallard ponders what might have implications China's rise on the international stage.

The author  notes  that "after leading China back into the world" in the 80s, Deng Xiaoping began to encourage a foreign policy that translates roughly as "hide your light, wait for your moment."

It was a period of reform and opening: China was weak, poor and had a lot of ground to recover. Therefore, according to the author, it made sense to "keep a low profile on the international scene".

"Xi Jinping seems to have left to hide and wait" said Stallard.

When Hu entered the Great Hall of the People in Beijing to promote his new initiative of  the Silk Road  in the framework of the International Forum held on 14 and 15 May, "there was nothing apologetic or referential in their behavior" .

Instead, Xi Jinping seems to have decided that now is the time when China "stand firm and show itself, though insisting that his power poses no threat and can be a force for good in the world" .

Thus, according to the author, the leader of the Asian giant must convince regional neighbors even those involved in disputes territoriales- "they have nothing to fear and everything to gain from the rise of China".

In addition, Beijing is obliged to ensure that Washington does not plan to replace him in "Treetop", but seeks "peaceful coexistence". Therefore, the president usually characterizes the resurgence of the country in terms reassuring and non - threatening.

According to Stallard, when Xi Jinping speaks of foreign policy, he likes to mention "a new type of international relations" with "mutual respect" and "mutually beneficial cooperation".

"In other words, China no longer wants to play the second role in an international order led by the US and wants a new order in which you treat her as an equal, and undertakes to treat others the same way , " he says the author.

By giving their views on the new economic belt of the Silk Road, the Chinese leader chose the example of Admiral of the fifteenth century, Zheng He, whom he described as "a pioneer, not a conqueror, who would be remembered as a friendly envoy ".

In this scenario, Stallard continued, "Admiral Xi is sailing with his treasure to share it along the Silk Road in the form of new investments in infrastructure."

However, according to the author, no leader of the G7, with the exception of Italy, attended the Beijing Summit.

The journalist recalled that in 2014 China Xi Jinping compared with a "sleeping lion, that will shake the world when you wake up."

"Today the lion is awake, but it is peaceful, pleasant and civilized"

SOURCE:  https://mundo.sputniknews.com/asia/201705161069203578-china-ascenso-leon/

Facebook to vie privée I violated the 33 millions de personnes in France

Mercredi 17 mai 2017

Facebook France condamné à amende pour une des lois violation sur la vie privée du pays, alors que la société à être adéclaré "in désaccord avec respect." 

Facebook serait suivi et être utilisé personnelles desinformations 33 millions d'utilisateurs of et d'autres non - utilisateurs qui surfent sur Internet. 

The Commission nationale and Data Protection of France Facebook condamné à une amende 150,000 euros ($ 166,000) mardi pour effectuer une collecte données à massive of personnelles sans aucune des fins publicitaires légale justification. 

The Commission noticed that utilisateurs them to avaient aucun moyen de s'opposer à la collecte de données personnelles, you Telles that religieuses ou des politiques opinions sexuelle et l'orientation. 

Facebook   n ' a pas à répondre took me sur le fait et insists, paradoxalement, which are center of travail est "of mettre les gens dans le contrôle de leur vie privée. 

" Il n'est pas la première fois le réseau social that Mark Zuckerberg est face à desaccusations of violation of privée vie. Parmi beaucoup d'autres, à Vienne, il est l'objet d'une demande des lois massive violation pour sur la vie privée de l'Union européenne. telesurtv une demande des lois massive violation pour sur la vie privée de l'Union européenne. telesurtv une demande des lois massive violation pour sur la vie privée de l'Union européenne. 

telesurtv

The CIA not only torture, experienced in Human Beings

The reformulation of interrogation techniques CIA as a violation of medical and scientific ethics may be the best way to achieve accountability.

By   Lisa Hajjar

16 December 2014

(AP Photo / Maya Alleruzzo, File)

H  uman experimentation was a central feature of program CIA torture. The experimental nature of the interrogation techniques and detention is clearly evident in the executive summary of the Intelligence Committee of the US Senate investigation report, despite newsrooms (insisted by the CIA) to hide the location of these laboratories cruel sciences and the identity of the authors.

At the head of this project human experimentation were two psychologists hired by the CIA, James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen. They designed protocols interrogation and detention they and others applied to people imprisoned in secret agency "black sites".

In its response to the Senate report, the CIA justified its decision to hire the duo: "We believe that his experience was so unique that had been abandoned would not have sought out when it became clear that the CIA would head into the unknown territory of the program . "Mitchell and Jessen ratings the experience did not include interrogation, specialized knowledge about al Qaeda or cultural or linguistic knowledge relevant. What they had was the experience of the Air Force in the study of the effects of torture of prisoners of war and a curiosity about whether the theories of "learned helplessness" derived from experiments in dogs could work on human enemies .

To implement these theories, Mitchell and Jessen supervised or personally engaged in techniques intended to produce "weakness, disorientation and fear." His "theory" had a particular means and ends relationship is not well understood, as Mitchell explained angrily in an interview Vice News: "the point of the bad cop is to get the bad guy to talk to the good cop" in other words, "enhanced interrogation techniques" (a euphemism for the Bush administration torture) do not themselves produce useful information; Rather, they produce the condition of total submission to facilitate the extraction of actionable intelligence.

Mitchell, as former CIA Director Michael Hayden and others who have defended the torture program, argues that a fundamental error in the Senate report is the elision of   media   (waterboarding "rectal rehydration," weeks or months nudity total darkness and isolation, and other techniques to break prisoners) and   ends the -Manufactured compliance, which, advocates say, allowed the rich collection of intelligence that keeps Americans safe. (This statement is broad and contradicted the report authority.)

As Americans from the Beltway to the debate heart, again, the legality and effectiveness of "enhanced interrogation , " we are reminded that "torture" has lost its stigma as a morally reprehensible and criminal behavior. That was evident in the GOP presidential primary of 2012, when more than half of the candidates promised to bring back the submarine, and now is on full display. On  Meet the Press  , for example, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who headed the national security functional hierarchy of decision-making during the Bush years, announced that "would do it again in a minute."

No one has been held accountable for torture, beyond a handful of trials of low-level soldiers and contractors. In fact, impunity has been virtually guaranteed as a result of several Faustian bargains, including "golden shield" memoranda written by government lawyers for the CIA; post immunity for war crimes that Congress inserted into the Military Commissions Act of 2006; classification and secrecy that still surrounds the torture program, as can be seen in the newsrooms of the report of the Senate; and the position of "looking forward, not backward," President Obama has maintained through each wave of public disclosures since 2009. A majority of America, apparently, has come to accept the legacy of torture.

human experimentation, however, not politically it has been renovated and transformed into a legitimate or justifiable business. Therefore, it would behoove us to appreciate the fact that the architects and implementers black site torture were authorized at the highest levels of the White House and the CIA to experiment with humans. Reading the report through this lens casts a different light on issues of accountability and impunity.

The "war on terrorism" is not the first foray of the CIA in human experimentation.At the dawn of the Cold War, scientists and physicians with Nazi German history of human experimentation were given new identities and brought to the United States under Operation Paperclip. During the Korean War, alarmed by the shocking rapidity of American war prisoners breakdowns and indoctrination by his communist captors, the CIA began investing in research into mind control. In 1953, the CIA established MK-ULTRA program, the first phase involved hypnosis, electroshock and hallucinogenic drugs. The program was developed in experiments of psychological torture that elements of Soviet and Chinese models were adapted, including standing for a long time, prolonged isolation, sleep deprivation and humiliation. Those lessons soon became an applied "science" in the Cold War.

During the Vietnam War, the CIA developed the Phoenix program, which combined with psychological torture brutal interrogations, human experimentation and extrajudicial executions. In 1963, the CIA was a manual titled "Kubark Counterintelligence Interrogation" to guide employed in the art of extracting information from "resistant" sources by combining techniques to produce "weakness, disorientation and fear." As Communists tactics CIA largely avoided direct the body violently in favor of those that target the mind systematically attacking all human senses in order to produce the desired compliance state. The model of the Phoenix program was incorporated into the curriculum of the School of the Americas,

In the mid-1980s, the CIA practices became the subject of congressional investigations on US - backed atrocities in Central America. Both manuals were made public in 1997 as a result of the Freedom of Information Act litigation by  The Baltimore Sun  . That would have seemed like a moment "never again".

However, we are here again. This brings us back to Mitchell and Jessen.Because of their experience as instructors in the program of military Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape (SERE), after 9/11 were contacted by senior officials at the Pentagon and later by lawyers who wanted to know whether some SERE these techniques could be reverse-engineered to get terror suspects to talk.

The path of abstract hypothetical (SERE can be reverse engineered?) For the authorized use of waterboarding confinement boxes and runs directly in the field of human experimentation. On April 15, 2002, Mitchell and Jessen came to a black spot in Thailand to oversee the interrogation of Abu Zubaydah, the first "high value detainee" captured by the CIA. By July, more coercive Mitchell proposed to the headquarters of the CIA techniques, and many of these were approved in late July. From then until the program it is dry docked in 2008, at least thirty-eight people were subjected to psychological and physical torture, and the results were methodically documented and analyzed. That is the textbook definition of human experimentation.

My point is not to minimize the illegality of torture or legal imperatives to pursue the responsibility of the authors. On the contrary, because the concept of torture has been so confused and disputed, I suggest that responsibility would be more acceptable if publicly Reframed CIA program as one of human experimentation.If we did so, it would be harder to praise or excuse authors as "patriots" who "acted in good faith." Although torture has become a Rorschach test among political elites playing public opinion Sunday morning programs, human experimentation has no such community advocates and apologists

Be a proud American

https://www.thenation.com/article/cia-didnt-just-torture-it-experimented-human-beings/