https://misteri1963.blogspot.com.esgoogle.com, pub-5827770858464401, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0https://misteri1963.blogspot.com.argoogle.com, pub-5827770858464401, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0https://misteri1963.blogspot.com.cogoogle.com, pub-5827770858464401, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0https://misteri1963.blogspot.com.brgoogle.com, pub-5827770858464401, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 google.com, pub-5827770858464401, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0 Misteri1963

Translate

viernes, 28 de abril de 2017

Washington Plans to Nuke Russia and China Paul Craig Roberts

Washington Plans to Nuke Russia and China

Not everyone likes to hear about the threat of nuclear war. Some find refuge in denial and say that nuclear war is impossible because it makes no sense. Unfortunately, humankind has a long record of doing things that make no sense.
In previous posts in recent years I have pointed out both written documents and changes in US war doctrine that indicate that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear attack on Russia and China. More recently, I have shown that Washington’s demonization of Russia and President Putin, the incessant lies about Russian deeds and intentions, and the refusal of Washington to cooperate with Russia on any issue have convinced the Russian government that Washington is preparing the Western populations for an attack on Russia. It is obvious that China has come to the same conclusion.
It is extremely dangerous to all of mankind for Washington to convince two nuclear powers that Washington is preparing a preemptive nuclear strike against them. It is impossible to imagine a more reckless and irresponsible act. Yet this is precisely what Washington has done.
Lt. Gen. Viktor Poznikhir, Deputy Head of Operations of the Russian General Staff has concluded that Washington in pursuit of global hegemony is implementing an anti-ballistic missile system that Washington believes can prevent a Russian nuclear response to a US pre-emptive attack. http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/04/us-forces-preparing-sudden-nuclear.html
Careful studies have convinced the Russians that Washington is investing in and arranging components that have no other function than to devastate Russia and cripple the country’s retaliatory capability. In short, Washington is preparing to launch a nuclear war. https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/
As I explained previously, the theory behind this insane scheme is that after America’s preemptive strike Russia will be so devastated that Russia would not retaliate with any remaining forces out of fear that Washington would launch a second major strike. Washington also plans to use agents in place to assassinate as many members as possible of the Russian government, thus leaving the government in confusion without leadership.
Yes, the insane American/Israeli neoconservatives are this determined to exercise hegemony over the world.
Yes, Washington is sufficiently criminally insane to risk the destruction of life on earth based on the supposition that Washington’s offense will work perfectly and Russia and China’s capabilities will be so degraded that no retaliatory response will occur.
One might hope that the American and Western populations would be outraged that Washington is so power-crazed that Washington is subjecting all life to such risks. But there is no sign of an anti-war movement. The Western leftwing has degenerated into Identity Politics in which the only threat comes from white heterosexual males who are portrayed as misogynists, racists, and homophopes. The Western leftwing is no longer war-conscious. Indeed, the leftwing has become diverted into such silly irrelevancies as transgender rights to toilets of their choice. The impotence of the Western left is so overwhelming that the left might as well not exist.
Where then is the hope? Russia and China cannot simply sit there and await America’s preemptive nuclear strike.
Possibly Washington does not intend a preemptive strike, but only to convince Russia and China that Washington’s preparations give Washington so much predominance in a conflict that Russia and China will submit to Washington’s hegemony. But this interpretation of Washington’s intention implies no less risk. Why would Russia and China wait for Washington to complete its preparations for war, preparations that permit Washington to turn Russia and China into puppet states?
The US military/security complex has clearly prevailed over Trump’s intention to normalize relations between the US and Russia, and anti-Russian venom continues to pour out of NATO and Washington’s European vassal states. The majority of the American people seem to have accepted the propaganda that Russia is the number one threat to the United States. With propaganda controlling the explanation, Washington’s aggressive actions are explained as defense against a threat and not as a policy that will end life on earth.
The chances are high that life on earth is approaching its end. The responsibility lies heavily on the American people, whose success, due to the mistakes of others, made Americans think that they are exceptional and privileged. Unaware of the inhumane threat to all life that is embodied in the neoconservative claim that Americans are exceptional and indispensable, the self-satisfied American public is unaware of the consequences of such hubris. Hubris is leading them, and the entire world, to slaughter in thermo-nuclear war.
The neoconservative claim of American exceptionalism is the identical claim made for Germans by Hitler. If Americans are indispensable, everyone else is dispensable and can be “bombed into the stone age” as one US government official put it, or nuked as Washington intends to do to Russia and China. The claim of American exceptionalism is not accepted by Russia and China.Therefore, the insane, crazed monsters who rule over the West in Washington are bringing life on earth to an end.
And there are no protests. The idiot British, the idiot Germans, the idiot French, Italians, Canadians, Australians, Belgians, Greeks, Portuguese, Spanish, Japanese, rally behind the insanity that is Washington.
And so apparently do the American people, a population stupid beyond all belief.

Los planes de Washington a Nuke Rusia y China Paul Craig Roberts

Los planes de Washington a Nuke Rusia y China

No todo el mundo le gusta escuchar sobre la amenaza de una guerra nuclear. Algunos encuentran refugio en la negación y dicen que la guerra nuclear es imposible porque no tiene sentido. Por desgracia, la humanidad tiene un largo historial de hacer las cosas que no tienen sentido.
En entradas anteriores en los últimos años he señalado ambos documentos y los cambios en la doctrina de guerra de Estados Unidos escritas que indican que Washington está preparando un ataque nuclear preventivo contra Rusia y China. Más recientemente, he demostrado que la demonización de Rusia y el Presidente Putin de Washington, los incesantes mentiras sobre acciones e intenciones rusas, y la negativa de Washington a cooperar con Rusia sobre cualquier tema han convencido al gobierno ruso que Washington está preparando las poblaciones occidentales para una ataque a Rusia. Es obvio que China ha llegado a la misma conclusión.
Es extremadamente peligroso para toda la humanidad para Washington para convencer a dos potencias nucleares que Washington está preparando un ataque nuclear preventivo contra ellos. Es imposible imaginar un acto más imprudente e irresponsable. Sin embargo, esto es precisamente lo que ha hecho Washington.
El teniente general Viktor Poznikhir, Director Adjunto de Operaciones del Estado Mayor General de Rusia ha llegado a la conclusión de que Washington en la búsqueda de la hegemonía global está implementando un sistema de misiles antibalísticos que Washington cree que puede prevenir una respuesta nuclear ruso a un ataque de Estados Unidos con derecho preferente. http://www.fort-russ.com/2017/04/us-forces-preparing-sudden-nuclear.html
Estudios cuidadosos han convencido a los rusos de que Washington está invirtiendo y organizar los componentes que no tienen otra función que la de devastar Rusia y paralizar la capacidad de represalia del país. En resumen, Washington está preparando el lanzamiento de una guerra nuclear. https://www.rt.com/news/386276-us-missile-shield-russia-strike/
Como he explicado anteriormente, la teoría detrás de este esquema loco es que después de un ataque preventivo de Estados Unidos Rusia será tan devastado que Rusia no responder con todas las fuerzas restantes por temor a que Washington lanzaría una segunda huelga importante. Washington también planea usar agentes en el lugar de asesinar a tantos miembros como sea posible del gobierno ruso, dejando así el gobierno en la confusión sin liderazgo.
Sí, los neoconservadores americanos / israelí dementes son esta decidido a ejercer la hegemonía sobre el mundo.
Sí, Washington es suficientemente locos criminales correr el riesgo de la destrucción de la vida en la tierra basado en la suposición de que la ofensiva de Washington va a funcionar perfectamente y Rusia y capacidades de China será tan degradada que no se producirá ninguna respuesta de represalia.
Se podría esperar que las poblaciones estadounidenses y occidentales se mostraron indignados que Washington es tan loca por el poder que Washington está sometiendo toda la vida a esos riesgos. Pero no hay ninguna señal de un movimiento anti-guerra. El ala izquierda occidental ha degenerado en la política de identidad en el que la única amenaza viene de los hombres blancos heterosexuales que son retratados como misóginos, racistas, y homophopes. El ala izquierda occidental ya no es la guerra-consciente. De hecho, el ala izquierda ha convertido desviado hacia irrelevancias tales tontos como derechos de los transexuales a los baños de su elección. La impotencia de la izquierda occidental es tan abrumadora que puede ser que también no existe la izquierda.
¿Dónde está entonces la esperanza?Rusia y China no pueden simplemente sentarse allí y esperar ataque nuclear preventivo de Estados Unidos.
Posiblemente Washington no tiene intención de un ataque preventivo, pero sólo para convencer a Rusia y China de que los preparativos de Washington Washington dan tanta predominancia en un conflicto que Rusia y China se someterán a la hegemonía de Washington. Pero esta interpretación de la intención de Washington no implica menos riesgos. ¿Por qué Rusia y China esperar a Washington para completar sus preparativos para la guerra, preparaciones que autoricen a Washington a su vez Rusia y China en estados títeres?
El complejo militar / seguridad de Estados Unidos ha impuesto con claridad sobre la intención de Trump para normalizar las relaciones entre los EE.UU. y Rusia, y anti-rusa veneno sigue derramando de la OTAN y estados vasallos europeos de Washington. La mayoría del pueblo estadounidense parece haber aceptado la propaganda que Rusia es la principal amenaza para los Estados Unidos. Con la propaganda controlar la explicación, las acciones agresivas de Washington se explican como defensa contra una amenaza y no como una política que ponga fin a la vida en la tierra.
Hay muchas posibilidades de que la vida en la tierra está llegando a su fin.La responsabilidad recae en gran medida en el pueblo estadounidense, cuyo éxito, debido a los errores de los demás, hecha estadounidenses piensan que son excepcionales y privilegiada. Sin darse cuenta de la amenaza inhumana de toda la vida que se materializa en la afirmación neoconservadora que los estadounidenses son excepcionales e indispensable, el público estadounidense satisfecho de sí mismo no es consciente de las consecuencias de tal arrogancia. Hubris ellos, y todo el mundo está dando lugar, a la matanza en la guerra termonuclear.
La reivindicación neoconservador de excepcionalidad estadounidense es la afirmación de idéntico hecho para alemanes por Hitler. Si los estadounidenses son indispensables, a todos los demás es prescindible y puede ser “bombardeado en la edad de piedra”, como un funcionario del gobierno de Estados Unidos puso, o bombardeado ya que Washington pretende hacer a Rusia y China. La pretensión de la excepcionalidad estadounidense no es aceptada por Rusia y China. Por lo tanto, los monstruos dementes, locos que gobiernan sobre Occidente en Washington están trayendo la vida en la tierra a su fin.
Y no hay protestas. El idiota británicos, los alemanes idiota, el idiota franceses, italianos, canadienses, australianos, belgas, griegos, portugués, español, japonés, reunión detrás de la locura que es Washington.
Y así, al parecer, hacer que el pueblo estadounidense, una población estúpida más allá de toda creencia.

jueves, 27 de abril de 2017

Putin: Syrian Chemical Attack a ‘False Flag,’ More Coming



Written by Carey Wedler


(ANTIMEDIA) Though Western media and the political establishment’s narrative has accepted the Syrian government’s responsibility for last week’s horrific chemical weapons attack in Idlib, Syria, some prominent voices are disputing their as-of-yet unsubstantiated certainty.


Russian President Vladimir Putin made a bold accusation this week, asserting the chemical attack in Syria was a false flag attempt intended to demonize Assad to ostensibly justify American intervention against the Syrian government. During a joint press conference in Moscow with Italian President Sergio Mattarella, Putin said:

We're revolutionizing the news industry, but we need your help! Click here to get started.

“President Mattarella and I discussed it, and I told him that this reminds me strongly of the events in 2003, when the US representatives demonstrated at the UN Security Council session the presumed chemical weapons found in Iraq. The military campaign was subsequently launched in Iraq and it ended with the devastation of the country, the growth of the terrorist threat and the appearance of Islamic State [IS, formerly ISIS] on the world stage.”


He continued:

“We have reports from multiple sources that false flags like this one – and I cannot call it otherwise – are being prepared in other parts of Syria, including the southern suburbs of Damascus. They plan to plant some chemical there and accuse the Syrian government of an attack.”

Putin’s comments were reported by state-sponsored Russian news, RT but generally confirmed by Reuters.


Russia and Iran announced after the U.S. assault that they intend to respond to future attacks with force.

But as Russia condemns the attacks – and as Western media propagates the unproven claims by an anonymous U.S. official that Russia knew of the attack before it happened — the Kremlin is not alone in its suspicions.

After the chemical weapons attack last week, prominent Western leaders voiced their skepticism toward the official narrative.

Before Trump launched his airstrikes, former Rep. Ron Paul, who has long been a voice of opposition against military intervention, raised doubts about the likelihood Assad attacked his own people.

“Before this episode of possible gas exposure and who did what, things were going along reasonably well for the conditions,” he said. “Trump said let the Syrians decide who should run their country, and peace talks were making out, and Al Qaeda and ISIS were on the run.”

Indeed, just days before the chemical weapons attack, U.S. Ambassador Nikki Haley made it clear the U.S. would no longer be pursuing regime change in Syria.

“It looks like, maybe, somebody didn’t like that so there had to be an episode, and the blame now is we can’t let that happen because it looks like it might benefit Assad,” Paul observed. Haley switched her stance shortly after the attacks, claiming regime change is now a priority.

Ron Paul also pointed out that neoconservatives have been claiming Assad has been responsible for using poison gas on his own people, cautioning:

“It makes no sense, even if you were totally separate from this and take no sides of this and you were just an analyst, it doesn’t make sense for Assad under these conditions to all of the sudden use poison gasses,” Paul said. “I think it’s zero chance that he would have done this deliberately.”

Paul is not alone. Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie also openly questioned the established narrative that Assad was responsible, much to the surprise of CNN’s Kate Bolduan. “[F]rankly, I don’t think Assad would have done that. It does not serve his interests. It would tend to draw us into that civil war even further,” he said.

On the left, former Rep. Dennis Kucinich has also questioned the narrative. “We should have had an investigation here and then made a determination as to who was responsible,” he said on Fox News, also citing a 2013 chemical attack that was determined, in all likelihood, to be launched by Syrian rebels — not the Assad regime.

In a Facebook post, the outspoken non-interventionist pointed out the lack of a thorough investigation prior to Trump’s decision to launch airstrikes:

“There has been a rush to judgment over the origin of the chemical weapon attack in Idlib, Syria. Conclusions were drawn with no investigation, no gathering of evidence, no forensics, no independent international inquiry, only charges followed by military action. It is extraordinary that when anyone so much as asks for an investigation they are attacked politically. When a verdict is arrived at without facts how can we be sure?”

Similarly, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, who has introduced legislation to stop the U.S. government from arming terrorist factions in Syria, expressed doubt over the apparent certainty Assad was responsible.“The fact remains that they have not brought that evidence before Congress,” she said of U.S. claims Assad carried out the attack. Still, she acknowledged:

“If President Assad is found to be responsible after an independent investigation for these horrific chemical weapons attacks, I’ll be the first one to denounce him, to call him a war [criminal] and to call for his prosecution in the International Criminal Court.”

But her willingness to condemn Assad when the allegations are proven is not enough for the political establishment. Liberal and Democratic leaders have been calling on her base in Hawaii to vote her out of office over her dissenting opinion. A majority of senators support the airstrikes.

The United States must produce evidence to justify its strikes. But Putin, too, should be expected to produce proof that developments in Syria are the result of a false flag operation. Still, until these openly corrupt and hypocritical governments can provide evidence of their claims, it’s safe to say military violence should not be the first course of action

El ataque químico fue una falsa bandera y han a más

por Carey Wedler
11 Abril 2017
del Sitio Web TheAntiMediatraducción de Antonio Fernandez12 Abril 2017
del Sitio Web ConjugandoAdjetivos




Aunque los medios de comunicación occidentales y la narrativa de la clase política ha aceptado la responsabilidad del gobierno sirio sobre el horrible ataque con armas químicas de la semana pasada en Idlib, Siria, algunas voces prominentes están disputando su, hasta el momento, certeza sin fundamento.

El presidente ruso Vladimir Putin hizo una severa acusación esta semana, afirmando que el ataque químico en Siria fue un intentode bandera falsa destinada a demonizar a Assad para justificar la intervención estadounidense contra el gobierno sirio. 

Durante una rueda de prensa conjunta en Moscú con el presidente italiano Sergio Mattarella, Putin dijo:
"El Presidente Mattarella y yo lo discutimos, y le dije que esto me recuerda fuertemente los acontecimientos de 2003, cuando los representantes de los EE.UU. mostraron en la sesión del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU las presuntas 'armas químicas encontradas en Irak' (que luego resultaron ser inexistentes).

La campaña militar fue lanzada posteriormente en Irak y terminó con la devastación del país, el crecimiento de la amenaza terrorista y la aparición del EI en el escenario mundial", agregó. 
"Tenemos informes de múltiples fuentes de que ataques de banderas falsas como éste - y no puedo decir otra cosa - están siendo preparadas en otras partes de Siria, incluyendo los suburbios del sur de Damasco.

Planean lanzar un producto químico allí y acusar luego al gobierno sirio de un ataque".
Los comentarios de Putin fueron reportados por la patrocinada por el estado, agencia de noticias rusa, RT pero confirmados por Reuters.

Rusia e Irán anunciaron después del asalto de Estados Unidos que tienen la intención de responder a futuros ataques con fuerza.
 
Pero a medida que Rusia condena los ataques - y los medios occidentales propagan las afirmaciones no comprobadas por un funcionario anónimo de Estados Unidos que Rusia sabía del ataque antes de que ocurriera - el Kremlin no está solo en sus sospechas.

Después del ataque con armas químicas la semana pasada, prominentes líderes occidentales expresaron su escepticismo hacia la narrativa oficial.

Antes de que Trump lanzara sus ataques aéreos, ex Rep. Ron Paul, que ha sido durante mucho tiempo una voz de oposición en contra de la intervención militar, planteó dudas sobre la probabilidad de que Assad atacara a su propio pueblo:

"Antes de este episodio de la posible exposición de gas y que lo hicieron, las cosas iban a lo razonablemente bien", dijo

"Trump dijo que vamos a dejar a los sirios decidir quién debe dirigir su país, y las conversaciones de paz habían comenzado, y Al Qaeda e ISIS estaban huyendo".
De hecho, pocos días antes del ataque con armas químicas, la embajadora de Estados Unidos ante las Naciones Unidas Nikki Haley dejó claro que los EE.UU. ya no estaban persiguiendo un cambio de régimen en Siria.

Haley cambió su postura poco después de los ataques, reclamando que un cambio de régimen ahora era una prioridad.

Paul no está solo. 

El congresista por Kentucky Thomas Massie también cuestionó abiertamente la narrativa establecida que Assad fue el responsable, para sorpresa de Kate Bolduan de la CNN:
"No creo que Assad ha hecho esto. No sirve a sus intereses. Tendería a llevarnos a una profundización de la guerra civil", le dijo.
El ex Rep. Dennis Kucinich también ha cuestionado la narrativa:
"Deberíamos haber tenido una investigación aquí y luego realizar alguna acción cuando se supiera quién ha sido el responsable", dijo en Fox News, citando también un ataque químico en 2.013 que se determinó, con toda probabilidad, que fue realizado por los rebeldes sirios - no el régimen de Assad.
En un Facebook posterior, Dennis señaló la falta de una investigación a fondo antes de la decisión de Trump de lanzar los ataques aéreos:
"Ha habido un juicio apresurado sobre el origen del ataque de armas químicas en Idlib, Siria. 

Se sacaron conclusiones sin investigación, sin recolección de pruebas, no hay investigación forense, ninguna investigación internacional independiente, sólo los cargos seguido de una acción militar. 

Es extraordinario que cuando alguien pide una investigación es atacado políticamente. 

Cuando se llega a un veredicto sin hechos, ¿cómo podemos estar seguros?".
Del mismo modo, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard de Hawai, que ha introducido la legislación para evitar que el gobierno de Estados Unidos arme a las facciones terroristas en Siria, expresó sus dudas sobre la aparente certeza de que Assad fuera el responsable:
"El hecho es que no han traído la evidencia ante el Congreso", dijo sobre las afirmaciones estadounidenses de que Assad llevó a cabo el ataque. 
Aun así, reconoció:
"Si al presidente Assad se le encontrara culpable después de una investigación independiente sobre estos terribles ataques con armas químicas, seré el primero en denunciarlo, para llamarlo una guerra [penal] y para pedir su procesamiento ante la Corte Penal Internacional".
Los Estados Unidos deben presentar pruebas para justificar sus ataques. 

Sin embargo, de Putin también se debería esperar que presentara pruebas de que los acontecimientos en Siria son el resultado de una operación de falsa bandera. 

Aun así, hasta que estos gobiernos abiertamente corruptos e hipócritas puedan proporcionar evidencia de sus reivindicaciones, es seguro decir que la violencia militar no debe ser la primera línea de acción.

Major Strikes Against The Shadow Government


by Christina Sarich
April 04, 2017
from TheMindUnleashed Website





We've been promised that there are white hats taking down the cabal - the shadow government that even six former presidents have referenced - but is it really true?

Here are some of the pieces of the puzzle which suggest that the shadow government is actually failing against their opponents:




The Marble Framework is Exposed


The  3rd Vault 7 Wikileaks release suggests that the white hats just completed a major chess move against the deep state.

In essence, the Vault 7 release reveals that the CIA has anti-forensic programs in place (to cover their rear-ends). These are 676 source code files for the CIA's secret anti-forensic Marble Framework.

Marble is used to hamper forensic investigators and anti-virus companies from attributing viruses, trojans and hacking attacks to the CIA, but more importantly, it shows that they can cover up their own computer hacking into intelligence "dumps" such as suggesting Russia is responsible for everything happening in the U.S.




The Feds Are About to Be Audited


Just a few days ago Jason Chaffetz shocked everyone by saying that the House Panel on Government Reform was going to Audit the Federal Reserve.

The House panel has approved legislation that will allow a government watchdog audit the Federal Reserve's monetary policy decisions, a move bitterly opposed by the central bank.

The move was passed after only about 30 minutes of debate. They had their minds made up it was time to sink these fools.

Other bills have been submitted before to audit the Fed that were shot down, but President Trump has expressed interest in carrying this one through.

Let's hope he actually supports this one to the bitter end.

The Fed's total abolishment would start with an audit, which would then give us ample proof of reason to shut them down for good.




The Truth About Vaccines is Likely Around the Corner


Del Bigtree the producer of the movie Vaxxed, says CDC Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson and his claims are being investigated.

When he asked the oversight committee charged with investigating Dr. William Thompson's claims that MMR vaccines were causing autism in the past he was met with blank stares.

He is now reporting that every politician he speaks to knows exactly who Thompson is, and that his claims are being investigated.




The Syrian War Policy Has Been Changed


Representative Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) called out our government a few weeks back and asked them to stop funding terrorists, after travelling to Syria for herself on a secret trip to see exactly what was going on.

The U.S. also admitted that the ISIS headquarters they just blew up was aninnocent family's home, and Assange says the CIA created ISIS.

Maybe that's why the Syrian war policy is suddenly abruptly changing.




Something is Brewing with Pizzagate


After doing an abrupt about-face on PizzagateAlex Jones issued a formal apology.

This should clue us in that things are heating up. Big media players like Money magazine and NPR reported the heck out of this abrupt change in opinion, without explaining why Jones would be so brash as to talk up the pedophile problem and then act as if it suddenly didn't exist.

This news is also timed just weeks afterTrump signed the Presidential Executive Order on Enforcing Federal Law with Respect to Transnational Criminal Organizations and Preventing International Trafficking.

Now John Podesta is seeking immunity if he is to testify about Hillary, and other pedophilia business, which he has been linked to.

I'm not sure who is about to wail on all the big wigs.

It could be Podesta, or someone else to save their own rear-ends, but someone's about to give up the goose. This could spell the beginning of the end for international pedophilia rings in the U.S. and U.K.

Our times stay interesting, if nothing else.

Let's hope the white hats are winning, and with our help to pass the message, the cabal's attempts to control information are at least stymied...

Entrada destacada

PROYECTO EVACUACIÓN MUNDIAL POR EL COMANDO ASHTAR

SOY IBA OLODUMARE, CONOCIDO POR VOSOTROS COMO VUESTRO DIOS  Os digo hijos míos que el final de estos tiempos se aproximan.  Ningú...