It is possible that this week we witness a great ridicule on the part of the Spanish government or something much worse perpetrated with the connivance of the Constitutional.
The single reading procedure also exists in several communities and in Spain (both in the Senate and in Congress).
First of all read this piece of ABC article:
-Hala, what the Catalans have done! Some will think ...
Well, look at this another:
You see, the plenums of every Spanish camera can do it too ...
As always, you, dear reader, will wonder -and why then all this mess?
Because the government of Rajoy and his powers de facto believe that the Spanish citizen is sovereign, sovereignly illiterate and destitute intellectual. And you can be deceived, and more if the lie carries the icing on "Catalunya".
By the way, as you will have read, it speaks of a broad consensus ...
What a mania in blaming others that they do not legislate well ... They could have put 3/4 parts of the camera or 2/3 parts ...
Well DO NOT!
"Broad consensus" is what each of you believes it can be. Maybe for somebody it is a broad consensus 72 against a 63 ...
This unique reading system, the Spanish government uses it mainly to avoid humiliating Basques and Navarre ...
I suppose that many of you have thought more than once - how is that every time the economic concert is renewed and / or changed Of the Basque Country and Navarre there is no parliamentary debate in which every politician can say his own ...?Let the C's come out saying that the quota is a reminder of the Franco regime or that the PNV defend it with vehemence ...
And the answer is because it is approved under the single reading procedure ...
As I write this, I hear their cries of indignation ... But they are of little use if we do not take the 1-O very seriously and defend our rights tooth and nail.
But the details do not end here; It is not necessary for the spokesperson to agree in the single reading procedure.
Just the table
And the table of the congress of deputies is this:
3 of the PP, 2 of C's, 2 of the PSOE and 2 of We can
, the PP and C's decide if there is a single reading.
And in Catalonia the Mesa is formed by:
4 Junts pel Yes, 1 of C's, 1 of PSC and 1 of CSQP
The indepes can do also what they want.
It is what there is, who wins, wins ... Who has a majority, has a majority ... Here and in Spain.
In the analysis The legislative process in single reading by Yolanda Gómez Lugo (read it) reminds us that it does not require a qualified majority or exclude matters ...
What happens is that from Madrid consider that the single reading if it benefits the disconnection is not worth ...
Something that does not say the law ...
In any case, what they find unconstitutional is that they can not submit amendments to the single reading procedure ...
Okay, just like in Andalusia ...:
This is the moment when you are about to blow your head and ask: -
Andalusia has a unique reading procedure just like the one in Catalunya and no one had noticed or sent it to the elephant cemetery of the Council of State or Constitutional?
-As is.
- And why the press of Madrid does not say it?
Ha ha ha ha ha ...
-But the trick must be that in the guarantor of world democracy that is Spain YES I can file amendments ...
SO EVEN!
Thus criticizes the good Yolanda Gomez in the link to the PDF above:
It is clear that the single reading procedure is debatable, objectionable and its ambiguity creates suspicion, but as long as it is not changed is completely legal and constitutional.
And although you think that all this is crazy, what approved the Government of the Generalitat is a processing system that uses the government of Spain and Andalusia ...
That is why, if we see that the Constitutional Court is laying it down, we can say that Spain is Turkey.
Although, beware, with the Estatut already happened that some articles declared unconstitutional are in force in other communities
