The Assault on Trump

Paul Craig Roberts

We are witnessing an assault by the national security state and its liberal media on a President of the United States that is unprecedented.

Wild and unsupported accusations of treasonous or illegal Russian connections have been the mainstay of the news since Trump’s campaign for president. These accusations have reached the point that there is an impeachment movement driven by the national security state and its liberal media and endorsed by Democrats, the American leftwing which has turned against the working class as “Trump deplorables,” and luminaries such as Harvard Law Professor Larry Tribe. The Washington Post, which was not present at the meeting of President Trump with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov, purports to know that Trump gave Lavrov US national security information.

The Russian government has offered the presstitute media a transcript of the meeting, but, of course, the pressitutes are not interested.

The latest story is that Trump tried to bribe FBI Director Comey, before he fired him, not to investigate Trump as part of the “Russian investigation.” Clearly there is no intelligence left in the American media. The President doesn’t need to bribe someone he can fire.

What we are witnessing is the determination of the national security state to keep their prized “Russian Threat” in its assigned role as the Number One Threat to the US. The liberal media, owned by the CIA since the 1950s is in accord with this goal.

The American media is so accustomed to its enslavement by the national security state that it does not think of the consequences. But Professor Stephen Cohen does. I agree with him that the greatest threat to national security “is this assault on President Trump.” http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47076.htm

Cohen said that there is a 4th branch of government, the intelligence community, which obstruts the management of American foreign affairs by the executive branch and Congress.

As an example, he reminded us that “In 2016, President Obama worked out a deal with Russian President Putin for military cooperation in Syria. He said he was going to share intelligence with Russia, just like Trump and the Russians were supposed to do the other day. Our department of defense said it wouldn’t share intelligence. And a few days later, they killed Syrian soldiers, violating the agreement, and that was the end of that. So, we can ask, who is making our foreign policy in Washington today?”

In the 1960s, President John F. Kennedy thought he was in charge, and he was assassinated for his belief. JFK blocked an invasion of Cuba, the Northwoods project, a preemptive nuclear strike on the Soviet Union, and spoke of ending the Cold War.

In the 1970s President Nixon was driven from office, because he thought he was in charge of foreign policy. Like Kennedy, Nixon was a threat to the national security state. Nixon pushed through SALT 1 and the anti-ABM Treaty, and he opened to China, defusing those tensions as well. The military/security complex saw its budget dwindling as the threat dwindled. Nixon also determined to withdraw from Vietnam, but was constrained by the national security state. Nixon, the most knowledgeable president about foreign affairs, was forced from office, because his efforts in behalf of peace constituted a threat to the power and profit of the military/security complex.

It is important to understand that there is no evidence whatsoever against Nixon in the Washington Post “investigation.” The Post’s reporters simply put together a collection of inuendoes that cast aspersion on Nixon, whose “crime” was to say that he learned of the Watergate buglary at a later date than he actually did. Nixon kept the burglary quiet until after his reelection, because he knew that the CIA’s Washington Post would use it in an effort to prevent his reelection.

The “crime” for which Nixon was really removed was his success in establishing more peaceful and stable relations with Russia and China.

Trump, being in real estate and entertainment, was unaware of the landmines on which he was stepping when he said it was time to normalize relations with Russia and to rethink the purpose of NATO.

The US military/security complex sits on a budget extracted from very hard-pressed American taxpayers of $1,000 billion dollars annually. By threatening to normalize relations with the enemy which was created in order to justify this vast budget, Trump presented as the major threat to the American National Security State’s power and profit.

This is why Trump will be broken and/or removed as President of the United States.

Once again democracy in American is proving to be powerless. There is no one in Washington who can help Trump. Those who could help him, such as myself, cannot be confirmed by the US Senate, which is owned lock, stock, and barrel by the military/security complex, Wall Street, and the Israel Lobby.

Trump tried to connect the suffering American people to their government, an act of treason against the oligarchy, who are making an example of Trump that will dissuade politicians in the future from making populist appeals to the people.

Another large-scale cyberattack underway

Link: https://www.yahoo.com/tech/another-large-scale-cyberattack-underway-experts-194944965.html

A global cybersecurity firm has warned that another large-scale, stealthy cyberattack is underway on a scale that could dwarf last week's assault on computers worldwide.

Another large-scale, stealthy cyberattack is underway on a scale that could dwarf last week's assault on computers worldwide, a global cybersecurity firm told AFP on Wednesday.

The new attack targets the same vulnerabilities the WannaCry ransomware worm exploited but, rather than freeze files, uses the hundreds of thousands of computers believed to have been infected to mine virtual currency.

Following the detection of the WannaCry attack on Friday, researchers at Proofpoint discovered a new attack linked to WannaCry called Adylkuzz, said Nicolas Godier, a researcher at the computer security firm.

"It uses the hacking tools recently disclosed by the NSA and which have since been fixed by Microsoft in a more stealthy manner and for a different purpose," he said.

Instead of completely disabling an infected computer by encrypting data and seeking a ransom payment, Adylkuzz uses the machines it infects to "mine" in a background task a virtual currency, Monero, and transfer the money created to the authors of the virus.

Virtual currencies such as Monero and Bitcoin use the computers of volunteers to record transactions. They are said to "mine" for the currency and are occasionally rewarded with a piece of it.

Proofpoint said in a blog that symptoms of the attack include loss of access to shared Windows resources and degradation of PC and server performance, effects which some users may not notice immediately.

"As it is silent and doesn't trouble the user, the Adylkuzz attack is much more profitable for the cyber criminals. It transforms the infected users into unwitting financial supporters of their attackers," said Godier.

Proofpoint said it has detected infected machines that have transferred several thousand dollars worth of Monero to the creators of the virus.

The firm believes Adylkuzz has been on the loose since at least May 2, and perhaps even since April 24, but due to its stealthy nature was not immediately detected.

"We don't know how big it is" but "it's much bigger than WannaCry", Proofpoint's vice president for email products, Robert Holmes, told AFP.

A US official on Tuesday put the number of computers infected by WannaCry at over 300,000.

"We have seen that before -- malwares mining cryptocurrency -- but not this scale," said Holmes.

The WannaCry attack has sparked havoc in computer systems worldwide.

Britain's National Health Service, US package delivery giant FedEx, Spanish telecoms giant Telefonica and Germany's Deutsche Bahn rail network were among those hit.

While the rate of new infections has slowed, researchers at cybersecurity firm Check Point said the malware continues to spread rapidly.

And another expert added that despite a quick breakthrough that WannaCry to be slowed down, researchers don't fully understand  it.

"The problem is that we're still not certain about the origin of the infections" as contrary to many previous attacks it wasn't via emails which deceive users into installing the virus, said the expert on condition of anonymity.

More attacks could be soon be underway as the hacker group TheShadowBrokers that leaked the vulnerabilities used by WannaCry and Adylkuzz has threatened to publish more.

It said in a post it would begin providing information monthly by subscription in June, saying that in addition to Windows 10 vulnerabilities it would include "compromised network data from Russian, Chinese, Iranian, or North Korean nukes and missile programs".

Otro ciberataque a gran escala en marcha

Enlace: https://www.yahoo.com/tech/another-large-scale-cyberattack-underway-experts-194944965.html

Una firma global de ciberseguridad, ha advertido de que otro gran escala, sigiloso ataque cibernético está en marcha en una escala que podría empequeñecer asalto de la semana pasada en los ordenadores de todo el mundo.

ético está en marcha en una escala que podría empequeñecer asalto de la semana pasada en los ordenadores de todo el mundo, una firma global de ciberseguridad a la AFP el miércoles.

El nuevo ataque se dirige a las mismas vulnerabilidades del gusano ransomware WannaCry explotada, pero, en lugar de congelar los archivos, utiliza los cientos de miles de ordenadores que se cree que han sido infectados a la mísma moneda virtual.

Tras la detección del ataque WannaCry el viernes, los investigadores de Proofpoint descubrieron un nuevo ataque vinculado a WannaCry llama Adylkuzz, dijo Nicolas Godier, un investigador de la firma de seguridad informática.

"Utiliza las herramientas de hacking recientemente divulgados por la NSA y que desde entonces han sido fijados por Microsoft de una manera más sigilosa y con un propósito diferente", dijo.

En lugar de desactivar por completo un equipo infectado mediante el cifrado de datos y la búsqueda de pago de un rescate, Adylkuzz utiliza las máquinas que infecta a "mío" en una tarea en segundo plano una moneda virtual, Moneo, y transferir el dinero creado a los autores de virus.

monedas virtuales como Bitcoin Moneo y utilizan los ordenadores de voluntarios para registrar las transacciones. Se dice que "la mina" para la moneda y, ocasionalmente, son recompensados ​​con un pedazo de él.

Proofpoint dijo en un blog que los síntomas del ataque incluyen la pérdida de acceso a los recursos compartidos de Windows y la degradación del rendimiento del PC y el servidor, efectos, que algunos usuarios pueden no notar inmediatamente.

"Como es silencioso y no molestan al usuario, el ataque Adylkuzz es mucho más rentable para los  ciber  criminales. Transforma los usuarios infectados en partidarios financieros involuntarios de sus atacantes," dijo Godier.

Proofpoint dijo que ha detectado las máquinas infectadas que han transferido a varios miles de dólares en Monero a los creadores de virus.

La firma cree Adylkuzz ha sido en el flojo ya que al menos 2 de mayo y tal vez incluso desde el 24 de abril, pero debido a su naturaleza furtiva no fue detectado inmediatamente.

"No sabemos lo grande que es" pero "es mucho más grande que WannaCry", vicepresidente de Proofpoint para los productos de correo electrónico, Robert Holmes, a la AFP.

Un funcionario estadounidense el martes que el número de ordenadores infectados por WannaCry en más de 300.000.

"Hemos visto que antes - malwares criptomoneda minera - pero no esta escala", dijo Holmes.

El ataque WannaCry ha provocado estragos en los sistemas informáticos de todo el mundo.

Servicio de Gran Bretaña Nacional de Salud, el gigante estadounidense de entrega de paquetes FedEx, el gigante español Telefónica y red ferroviaria Deutsche Bahn de Alemania estaban entre los afectados.

Mientras que la tasa de nuevas infecciones ha disminuido, los investigadores de la empresa de seguridad cibernética Check Point dijo el malware sigue propagándose rápidamente.

Y otro experto agregó que a pesar de que un gran avance rápido WannaCry se ralentice, los investigadores no entienden completamente.

"El problema es que todavía no estamos seguros sobre el origen de las infecciones", como contrario a muchos ataques anteriores que no era a través de correos electrónicos que engañan a los usuarios para instalar el virus, dijo el experto en condición de anonimato.

Más ataques podrían ser pronto estarán en marcha como los TheShadowBrokers grupo de hackers que se filtraron las vulnerabilidades utilizadas por WannaCry y Adylkuzz ha amenazado con publicar más.

Se dijo en un post que comenzaría a proporcionar información mensual por suscripción en junio, diciendo que, además de Windows 10 vulnerabilidades que incluiría datos de la red "en peligro de China Rusia, Irán, o armas nucleares de Corea del Norte y los programas de misiles".

France Has Fallen!

France Has Fallen!

Truth is not comminuted: O count all or is not true - So PP and PSOE falsified the number of battered women

A heel strike or through laws promoted by lobbies, national sovereignty is lost in Europe, in favor of the Hidden Agenda of Zion and Corporations

So they falsified statistics "domestic violence" to cause paranoia gender:  from 50,000 to 2,000,000

• By  Rafaadmin ,  www.rafapal.com
• View Original
• May 17th, 2017
• 
  

This article demolishing become the "stake through his heart will scream vampire" who have destroyed the relations between men and women in Spain. 

Riddled with irrefutable data, which went unnoticed for most amid the brutal paranoia suffered, reading is almost obligatory for our brothers in the Americas because the mold used to generate this madness that has led to the homosexualization of a large part of youth is exactly the same. Read it by clicking here .

The Equality Minister Bibiana Aído, the Prime Minister, Zapatero and Vice President Fernandez de la Vega, when the law was passed against Gender Violence / Actuall

Gender Violence Act  So PP and PSOE falsified the number of battered women

• By  Juan Robles ,  www.actuall.com
• View Original
• May 16th, 2017
• 
  

The Law on Gender Violence was based on a false axiom that the woman was a victim for the sake of being a woman and the man guilty by the mere fact of being male.  

The problem is that the data were those who were  and there was no statistical basis to justify a law on gender violence. 

So the statistics are distorted:  do not let reality spoil you a good law.

And as the real number of victims was not for this scheme (there were almost dead heat of male and female deaths in the domestic sphere) figures are falsified and statistics are rigged, eliminating the deaths of children, elderly and men, so that appeared only women.

It was necessary to justify that would make a Domestic Violence Act and, above all,  it was necessary to justify the manna of the European Union  which were to benefit ministries, experts, social psychologists, law firms and feminist associations.

Spain would receive tens of millions of European funds for Gender Policy

Spain would receive tens of millions of European funds for gender policies and it had to prove that she was the victim and the executioner man. 

Otherwise, there was no money . No less than 24,000 million euros until 2012.

It all began in 2000 when the Spanish government (with Aznar in power), spurred by the PSOE and feminist associations  decided to apply the policies of gender feminism emanating from the Beijing Conference (1995).

But hardly they could implement these policies (and corresponding financial allowance from Brussels) if the number of female victims was only slightly higher than male.

Gender? What kind, if the data of domestic violence that drove the General Council of the Judiciary was 40% of male deaths and 60% of female deaths ( which with a population of 43 million means touching the dead heat in terms statistics)?

Simply analyze the historical series 1995-2004 of the Statistical Yearbook of the Ministry of Interior (Police, Civil Guard)  to conclude the same as the data of the Observatory against Domestic Violence Council of the Judiciary, ie the number of deaths in domestic violence or domestic stably distributed 40% male / 60% female.

Solution? the variable man eliminated in domestic violence statistics Council as well as organizations began working with public funds to the dictates of gender feminism.

And the prestigious Reina Sofía Center on Adolescence and Youth worked on women only variable express indication of the Council of the Judiciary man eliminating the variable in their statistics.

It was thus jump "domestic violence" -that which covers all household members, regardless of her sex to "gender violence" which only contemplates a reality: women as victims.

And if men murdered? No problem, the data and concluded eludes matter.

Actuall you have had access to a document that proves so final. The answer to the Reina Sofía Center gave an estranged father, Isidro Fresneda , when it requested information on deaths of men in the family.

"We inform you that our efforts with the judiciary, so far, are going to continue to focus on killings of women."

I have read that right, appointment to the judiciary, that is  to say the instructions of the governing body of judges, the Reina Sofía is not reporting dead men . Statistically not exist ....

But the thing does not end here. What happens when a female which kills another? -in this case- not want to appear as an author, and therefore the woman variable is eliminated. According to the tenets of gender, women can never appear as a murderer, only and exclusively as a victim.

But that was not enough. It was necessary to show that women in Spain was battered by the mere fact of being . And in the absence of objective data, it was used to such a procedure as manipulable a survey. Because depending on the sample is chosen and the questions asked survey may be biased or another.

a survey to answer that the man does not value his work "sometimes" was developed and was considered technical abuse

The aim was to present to Congress a figure:  two million battered women . And to reconcile reality with that figure, nothing better than:

• Make a phone survey. Easier to handle than a face survey, with room for nuance.
• Ask exclusively for women (eliminating the male variable in cases of domestic violence).
• Collect perceptions, not objective facts or objectified.

And most importantly, consider "technical abuse" to vague, ambiguous and inaccurate responses.

For example, when asked if their partner (male) "does not value the work done" ... Or "does not take into account the needs of you" ... .or "It tells you where going to go without it." Only answer "sometimes" or "often" and technical abuse was considered. Which lacks rigor.

First because "no value work" or "not take into account the needs" is too vague. What needs referred specifically? How can you deduce from that, automatically, there is abuse? It depends.

And secondly because it is abuse, exercise  "physical or mental violence continued mode" (Pan - Hispanic Dictionary of doubts).  Can we call mental violence "does not value the work"? And it can be considered "ongoing violence as" the vague answer of "sometimes".

Thus, so little scientific and so manipulative, the Women's Institute in 2000 developed one macrosurvey and carried to term. The macrosurvey became the instrument of a self-fulfilling prophecy: prediction once made, is itself the cause of reality.

But the botched not stand the slightest filter and  so expressed the Iceberg Report (prepared by an independent working group),  which analyzes methodologically and presents its findings in the Senate in June 2001 (Joint Committee on the Rights of Women) .

It concludes that the Macrosurvey not meet the minimum methodological rigor for comparative studies by countries like US France and Germany such as Dunedin, Fiebert reports, the Report 111 on bidirectional violence or longitudinal Report Murray Straus.

However, the macro-CGPJ used as a tool to change the concept of domestic violence and eliminate gender violence statistics variable "man".

Instead of going to the Statistical Yearbook of the Civil Guard or the police (who spoke of some 50,000 override it complaints of mistreatment),  the Judiciary accepted as scientific fact the figure of 2 million battered women, and to justify the development of a Gender Violence Act.

On such unscientific budgets was established in 2002, the Observatory for Domestic Violence (through an agreement between the Council of the Judiciary and the Ministries of Justice and Social Affairs).

The document explaining the objectives assumes the thesis of gender ideology, saying, mostly proportion, "violence in the family (...)  constitutes violence, that is against women, which is based on the profound inequality of human beings. "

The goal was simply to cause alarm; and based on that channel through clientelistic structures,  the huge amount of public resources associations linked to PP and PSOE  channeled to lardo of years.

And it was lent, the governing body of judges and the Institute for Women. We talk about right-wing governments, chaired by Aznar (2000-2004) who laid the foundations for the famous law subsequently approved Zapatero's socialist government (2004).

One of the directors of the Institute of Women, Miriam Tey, admitted that after leaving office statistics were manipulated to continue the social alarm

We do not tell us. I recognized one of the directors of the Institute of Women, Miriam Tey, at a conference on the amendment of the Divorce Act and Joint Custody held in 2004 by the College of Psychologists of Madrid, when she had already left office.

In videotaped statements he said the figures on domestic violence were handled exactly when she ceased to be director of the institute, modifying the statistical variables. Thus, groups that were not considered as romantic relationship quickly incorporated into the electoral period  as aggressors in domestic violence to continue the social alarm and increase in number of deaths.

The rest is history. The 87'7% of complaints by domestic violence does not end in a conviction , but by the mere fact of filing the complaint, the man can be arrested, expelled from his home and disqualified joint custody, while the woman has right to comprehensive social assistance, employment benefits and receive financial aid.

And those who benefit from the network of false allegations are various feminist associations.

Specifically, according to published  Actuall ,  four feminist federations money from European funds hoard.  This is the Women 's Foundation, the Federation of Separated and Divorced Women; the Federation of Progressive Women and the Association of Jurists Themis.

Four feminist federations strongly linked to the PSOE hogging through thousands of associations all lines of work of the Strategic Plan against violence against women and, consequently, European funds to eradicate this scourge.

Zapatero sold the law as an instrument to "defeat the criminal machismo , " has proved ineffective  (because it decreases the number of murdered women) and also unfair (because it criminalizes the man for the sake of it).

Joaquín Leguina, former president of the Community of Madrid / EFE

Such absurdity and injustice saw the early  socialist Joaquín Leguina, who denounced him on a platform of  El País  in 2004 , when the Gender Violence Act was passed.

In the article,  Equality, parity and violence  indicated that handled as "revealed truth" that "violence is unidirectional, men against women and never backwards."

And he warned that "revealed truth" does not stand the results of the most creditworthy analysis. He gave the example of surveys on domestic violence conducted in the US. "In cases basically severe physical violence, 35% are attributed to man, 30% women and the remaining 35% both. When all the analyzed cases of violence, including emotional, double participation (men and women) is about 50% of cases. "

Not only Leguizamon. 

One hundred and eighty criminal progressive bias (judges, prosecutors, professors and specialists in criminal law), integrated into the so - called  Criminal Policy Group  issued a manifesto that year (2004), which harshly criticized the bill, warning it would be ineffective and "disappoint the victims." 

Eighty percent criminologists warned that the law would fail and that protection against women is due to the increased vulnerability of those people and not the mere fact of belonging to a certain genre

They were based on the grounds that it was necessary to solve "social scourge" of domestic violence. 

But they criticized the "positive discrimination" in favor of women , by the mere fact of being, "there is easily accommodated within the aims of criminal law".

Expressed fears that the Law on Gender Violence in crime could transform current lack of coercion and minor threats when they are committed by men and the victim is a woman.

And they added that "the criminal law should make clear that the enhanced protection [women] is due to the increased vulnerability of those people and not the mere fact of belonging to a particular genre."

In short, criminologists warned that failure was bound by law, to make gravitate on gender theory . 

Zapatero's government had evidence as well that discouraged approve it. But nevertheless he went ahead, dismissing the opinions of experts.

In Spain imported falsify data and statistics fat because, as we have seen, there was a lot of money at stake